Time to Talk to the Taliban?
Matt Waldman interviewed by Greg BrunoDespite a spiral of violence in Afghanistan, the United States must reorient its security-first strategy and consider immediate talks with...
Interviewee: Col. Martin P. Schweitzer, Chief, U.S. Army Senate Liaison Division, and Former Commander, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division
Interviewer: Greg Bruno, Staff Writer, CFR.org
February 19, 2009
As the U.S. government calibrates its new strategy in Afghanistan, advice is pouring in. President Obama has announced plans to send as many as 17,000 additional U.S. soldiers and marines to the fight, and his administration is conducting a comprehensive review of policies governing the U.S. approach. But in Afghanistan, a dynamic and complex country, strategy may best be formulated on the ground, where military commanders and Afghan leaders are cooperating on a daily basis.
Col. Martin P. Schweitzer, who was responsible for security operations in eastern Afghanistan from January 2007 to April 2008, says the local Afghan leaders he has worked with in Khost Province and elsewhere are far more capable than many Western pundits suggest. "As each year goes on, more is required and expected, and so I think there is a higher demand on the governmental institutions, governmental infrastructure," he says. And in most regions, the colonel notes, Afghan leaders at the provincial and district levels are performing well.
Yet Schweitzer says a host of problems continue to threaten progress, from endemic corruption to an entrenched drug trade. Meeting those challenges will require continued and lasting U.S. commitment. The extra troops pledged by Obama are only a part of the solution, he says. "Don't look at that as they're going in there to conduct kinetic full-scale operations. Most of the activities that they are going to be doing will be to establish and create capacity within the Afghan security forces; will be to establish and create capacity within local governorates at the district level." And Schweitzer says nonmilitary personnel from the U.S. Department of State, USAID, and even foreign governments will be an important piece of any new U.S. strategy.
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write outreach@cfr.org.
Saudi Arabia on the Edge
A leading Middle East scholar pens this "good introduction to the Saudi paradox of social change and political stability and an invaluable guide to the challenges the country faces." More
American Force
An investigation of the use of American force since the end of the Cold War. More
The Struggle for Egypt
A sweeping account of Egypt in the modern era: what Egypt is, what it stands for, and its relation to the world. More
Saudi Arabia in the New Middle East
Gause posits that, though the Arab Awakening has caused tensions in Saudi-American relations, the two countries do not face a crisis and still have significant mutual interests that should be prioritized.
Partners in Preventive Action
The authors assess the strengths and weaknesses of international institutions and provide a set of practical recommendations for how the United States can strengthen the global architecture for preventive action by partnering with those organizations.
Despite a spiral of violence in Afghanistan, the United States must reorient its security-first strategy and consider immediate talks with...
In replacing General Stanley McChrystal with General David Petraeus, a well-known counterinsurgency strategist, President Obama is betting...
As debate intensifies over resourcing the war in Afghanistan, expert Clare Lockhart says more attention must be paid to helping Afghans...
A top Pentagon official says victory in the global fight against terrorism is achievable, but may take decades to accomplish.