Print
Email
Share
Cite
This report on Open Democracy and written by Paul Rogers, professor of peace studies at Bradford University, England, argues that without a change of NATO strategy, the prospect for Afghanistan in 2007 is escalating violence.
Author: Paul Rogers
December 21, 2006
This report on Open Democracy and written by Paul Rogers, professor of peace studies at Bradford University, England, argues that without a change of NATO strategy, the prospect for Afghanistan in 2007 is escalating violence.
Facebook Twitter LinkedInMicah Zenko covers the U.S. national security debate.
CFR experts give their take on the issues emerging in Asia today.
What are the implications of growing Pakistan-China commercial relations for the United States?
The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces
Special operations play a critical role in how the United States confronts irregular threats, but to have long-term strategic impact, the author argues, numerous shortfalls must be addressed.
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
The new U.S.-Afghan strategic partnership agreement is a step forward as the Western troop drawdown clock ticks down, but Washington must...
President Obama's political objectives for Afghanistan are limited and feasible, says military historian Gian Gentile, but the military's...
Ray Takeyh argues that many critics of the Afghanistan war are wrong to compare it to Vietnam and that such comparisons are "absolutely...
Leslie Gelb writes that the U.S. military's request to increase troops in Afghanistan by 44,000 ought to be closely scrutinized. He adds...