Afghanistan Watch: Bridging the Expectations Gap in Afghanistan
The United States and its allies are in danger of losing Afghanistan says this op-ed from Afghanistan Watch. The authors argue that the most...
Interviewee: Rory Stewart, Chief Executive, Turquoise Mountain Foundation
Interviewer: Greg Bruno
April 14, 2008
The state of affairs in Afghanistan is often seen from the top down, but Rory Stewart, an Oxford-educated author, former British soldier, and one-time coalition deputy governor in Iraq, has a different perspective. For nearly a decade Stewart has maintained an intimate relationship with Afghanistan and its people. He now runs a non-government organization in Kabul, the Turquoise Mountain Foundation.
Stewart’s take on Afghanistan differs from many western military and political assessments. He says the country is “divided into two quite different areas.” People in the north, west, and center “are prospering” and remain grateful for the international focus on their homeland, he says. But Afghans in the south and east “are very traumatized, very impoverished,” and harbor deep resentment. “By and large, the reason why we’re fighting in southern Afghanistan and not fighting in the center and the north is that we’ve got more consent and more legitimacy in the center and the north than we do in the south.” Stewart says the best way to bring lasting stability to Afghanistan is through small, locally focused redevelopment projects, as opposed to top-down mandates from governments half a world away. “We need to be targeting our resources on what’s working, rather than trying to do things we can’t do.”
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write publications@cfr.org.
The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces
Special operations play a critical role in how the United States confronts irregular threats, but to have long-term strategic impact, the author argues, numerous shortfalls must be addressed.
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
The United States and its allies are in danger of losing Afghanistan says this op-ed from Afghanistan Watch. The authors argue that the most...
New polls reveal that Afghans increasingly are losing faith in their government and throwing their support behind the Taliban, which has...
International endorsement of a plan to hand security responsibilities to Afghan forces in 2014 indicates NATO's military commitment is not...
As military leaders in Washington revise their war strategy for Afghanistan, analysts say enlisting Afghan tribesmen could aid in security....