Authors: Amitai Etzioni, The George Washington University, and G. John Ikenberry, Princeton University
November/December 2011
Foreign Affairs
Before complaining about China's refusal to buy into the liberal world order, argues Amitai Etzioni, the West should stop moving the goalposts by developing new norms of intervention, such as "the responsibility to protect." G. John Ikenberry responds that Beijing already has more than enough inducement to sign up.
Subscribe to Foreign Affairs—the world's leading authority on foreign policy.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
No One's World
A renowned scholar maps out the twenty-first-century world, providing a detailed strategy for reconciling the West with the "rise of the rest." More
The US-South Korea Alliance
A new volume explores the possibilities for enhanced U.S.-South Korea cooperation in both traditional and nontraditional spheres. More
Countering Criminal Violence in Central America
The author assesses the causes and consequences of the violence faced by several Central American countries and examines the national, regional, and international efforts intended to curb its worst effects.
Richard N. Haass argues that as China's future becomes increasingly uncertain, it remains very much in the world's interest that China be...
China, which invests heavily in Iran's energy sector, is the linchpin of the sanctions regime against Iran.
Realist international relations theorists usually would predict that the basic pressures of the international system will force the United...
This Washington Quarterly article analyzes China's aggressive tack over the course of the past two years, and explains the internal tensions...
Print
Email
Share
