Publisher: Council on Foreign Relations
Release Date: December 20, 2012
The Center for Preventive Action’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey (PPS) evaluates ongoing and potential violent conflicts based on the impact they could have on U.S. interests and their likelihood of occurring in the coming year. Policymakers have limited time and resources for preventive action and thus have to focus on a select number of potentially harmful contingencies from a myriad of possibilities. The PPS polls experts in the field and aims to help the U.S. policy community prioritize these competing conflict prevention and mitigation demands. Click on the map below to see the contingencies associated with each country:
The Threat Matrix organizes contingencies based on their impact level and likelihood. Click on a matrix cell or tier ranking to view the relevant contingencies. Move your mouse over a category heading to view its definition.
|Tier I||Tier II||Tier III|
The Council on Foreign Relations acknowledges Carnegie Corporation of New York for its generous support of the Preventive Priorities Survey.
The OECD’s approach to bringing in emerging powers as “key partners” is a smart way to remain relevant in a quickly shifting global...
Joseph S. Nye Jr., Harvard University distinguished service professor at Harvard Kennedy School, and Stewart M. Patrick, senior fellow and...
Proposals from France and Brazil reopened a much-needed discussion on how to make the Security Council more responsive to mass atrocities...