Must Read

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite


Strategy for U.S. Engagement with the International Criminal Court

Authors: David J. Scheffer, and John Hutson
October 24, 2008


We know from our own professional experiences that there are risks in both diplomatic initiatives and military operations. The most logical negotiating position, strongly supported within the Washington bureaucracy, sometimes can be challenged so successfully by other governments during international talks that a search for compromise may emerge as the wiser course. American diplomats employ the same strat­egy with their counterparts who arrive at the table with seemingly unbend­able instructions-and yet, eventually, common ground is usually found. The greatest sin during negotiations is succumbing to dogma from extremists back home that American interests can only be protected by taking unyielding and exceptionalist positions.

Full Text of Document

More on This Topic

Analysis Brief

Caracas, Colombia, and Cocaine

Author: Stephanie Hanson

A sharp rise in Venezuelan cocaine trafficking undermines U.S. efforts to crack down on the narcotics trade in neighboring Colombia.

Analysis Brief

Trouble in the Andes

Author: Stephanie Hanson

A Colombian incursion into Ecuador sparks a regional diplomatic crisis at a time of increased arms spending across South America.

Analysis Brief

Colombia’s Parapolitics

Amid a widening scandal over links between his government and paramilitary violence, President Alvaro Uribe proposes a new anti-drug strategy...