Other Report

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite
Style:MLAAPAChicagoClose

loading...

A New National Security Strategy in an Age of Terrorists, Tyrants, and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Three Options Presented as Presidential Speeches

A Council Policy Initiative

Author: Lawrence J. Korb, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress

A New National Security Strategy in an Age of Terrorists, Tyrants, and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Three Options Presented as Presidential Speeches - a-new-national-security-strategy-in-an-age-of-terrorists-tyrants-and-weapons-of-mass-destruction-three-options-presented-as-presidential-speeches
Order Now

Publisher Council on Foreign Relations Press

Release Date May 2003

Price $15.00 paper

150 pages
ISBN 0876093292

Share

Contents

Foreword v

Acknowledgments vii

Memorandum to the President 1

Speech One: U.S. Dominance and Preventive Action 40

Speech Two: A More Stable World With U.S. Power for Deterrence and Containment 58

Speech Three: A Cooperative World Order 77

Appendixes 97

Appendix A: The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002 99

Appendix B: NSPD-17/HSPD-4: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, December 2002 140

Overview

Almost exactly a year after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush released to Congress and the American public his National Security Strategy, the most detailed and comprehensive statement of how his administration intends to protect the security of the United States in the post-September 11 world. While few have disagreed with the goals of the strategy, a great deal of controversy has arisen about how these goals should be implemented. This innovative paper, written by Senior Fellow Lawrence Korb, an expert with decades of experience on national security issues, lays out the best case for three different ways in which the administration could implement the presidentís strategy.

The first option recognizes that the traditional strategies of deterrence and containment will not work against tyrants and terrorists. Hence, it proposes that the United States adopt a bold new strategy of dominance and preventive action that elevates pre-emption to a cardinal norm, maintains military dominance, and actively seeks to extend free-market democracy throughout the globe. The second option asserts that active deterrence and containment will continue to work against even the most ruthless tyrants, that pre-emption should be reserved for exceptional circumstances, and that the United States needs only sufficient military power to protect its vital interests and should not overextend itself by trying to remake the world in its own image. The final option emphasizes that even with its great power, the United States cannot win the war against terrorists and tyrants unilaterally. Therefore, the best way for the United States to protect its interests is to work multilaterally with its allies and partners to create a more cooperative, rule-based international system backed by American power.

With the aim of generating thought and debate about national security, Lawrence Korb has written an insightful book that presents each alternative as presidential speeches, along with a memo that explains the strengths, weaknesses, and politics of each option. The Bush administrationís original National Security Strategy is included in an appendix to complement the three foreign policy proposals it inspired.

More About This Publication

More on This Topic

Article

The All-Powerful President

Author: Micah Zenko
Foreign Policy

Micah Zenko says regardless of who wins the election in November, there are five core principles of U.S. foreign policy that are widely held...

Op-Ed

Inside Obama's War Room

Author: Leslie H. Gelb
The Daily Beast

Leslie H. Gelb argues that the frequency and ease of decisions made by President Obama's National Security Council might reveal a worrisome...