Other Report

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite
Style:MLAAPAChicagoClose

loading...

Future Visions for U.S. Defense Policy : Four Alternatives Presented as Presidential Speeches

A Council Policy Initiative

Authors: John Hillen, and Lawrence J. Korb, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress

Future Visions for U.S. Defense Policy : Four Alternatives Presented as Presidential Speeches - future-visions-for-us-defense-policy-four-alternatives-presented-as-presidential-speeches
Order Now

Publisher Council on Foreign Relations Press

Release Date September 2000

Price $10.00 paper

84 pages
ISBN 0876092113

Share

Contents

Foreword v

Acknowledgments vii

Memorandum to the President from the National Security Advisor 1

Speech One: An Enhanced Defense 19

Speech Two: An Innovative Defense 35

Speech Three: A Cooperative Defense 50

Speech Four: A Prudent Defense 64

Background Materials 79

Overview

Though threats to American security have changed dramatically in the last decade, U.S. defense policy and military forces look a lot like they did during the closing days of the Cold War. The new administration has promised to make significant changes to U.S. defense spending, yet no book, until now, has explored the options and implications of each approach.

Future Visions for U.S. Defense Policy, a revised and updated Council Policy Initiative (CPI), explores these alternatives to U.S. defense policy through four “presidential” speeches. The alternatives are the following: the present level of funding, which the Council CPI labels “a prudent defense,” allows the U.S. military to wage two major regional conflicts nearly simultaneously and to do some peacekeeping for about $300 billion per year; the “enhanced defense” option, which would increase defense spending to $330 billion per year and assure the United States that it can execute the two-war strategy by improving U.S. military capabilities across the board and relying on allies for peacekeeping missions; a “cooperative defense,” which emphasizes building ad hoc international coalitions and focusing U.S. military forces on the real threats to U.S. interests--“civil and ethnic violence”--allowing a 15 percent to 20 percent budget cut; and an “innovative defense,” which keeps spending at the current level but switches defense dollars to future technologies rather than maintaining the existing force structure and buying additional current-generation weapon systems.

The case for a national missile defense is made in the enhanced defense option, the case against it in cooperative defense. This book is required reading for members of the Bush administration and anyone else concerned with America’s national security.

 

More About This Publication

 

More on This Topic