Author: Robert M. Gates
January/February 2009
Foreign Affairs
The United States cannot expect to eliminate national security risks through higher defense budgets, do everything, and buy everything. The Pentagon must set priorities and consider tradeoffs. It must balance trying to prevail in today's conflicts and preparing for tomorrow's, institutionalizing counterinsurgency capabilities, and maintaining its edge in conventional warfare.
Subscribe to Foreign Affairs—the world's leading authority on foreign policy.
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces
Special operations play a critical role in how the United States confronts irregular threats, but to have long-term strategic impact, the author argues, numerous shortfalls must be addressed.
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
North Korea, formally called the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), remains a top security concern for the United States, despite...
Both the Bush and Obama administrations have concluded that the use of drones to kill al-Qaeda leaders is permissible under both U.S....
The Obama administration has increasingly relied on drones in its counterterrorist operations. And, as I explain in a recent CFR report, U.S....
Conventional wisdom holds that the U.S. Army will bear the brunt of forthcoming defense cuts. But that need not be the case, provided it...
Print
Email
Share
Cite
