U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons
Why do mass shootings, such as the December 2012 incident at a Connecticut elementary school, occur more frequently in the United States than...
Interviewees: Roosevelt Montas, Professor of American Studies and Associate Dean at Columbia University
Donald Downs, Professor of Political Science, Law, and Journalism at the University of Wisconsin
Interviewer: Jonathan Masters, CFR Associate Staff Writer
April 1, 2011
Roosevelt Montas, professor and associate dean at Columbia, co-chaired the school's Task Force on Military Engagement, charged with reexamining the opinions of the student body on the ROTC issue. The clear message was that campus opinion had shifted in favor of a return of the program, he says. However, he stresses there is a generational rift, with student views "strikingly different" from that of Vietnam-era faculty. Donald Downs, professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin and author of the forthcoming book Arms and the University, notes that since the late 1960s, the focus of the ROTC-academia debate has drifted from issues of U.S. foreign policy and military intervention to disputes over social policy, such as sexual equality.
Both men agree the debate over ROTC's return to campus has been a magnet for misperception and media misrepresentation. Montas speaks of the cynical way the press portrayed an incident in which an army veteran and ROTC proponent was interrupted in his remarks before the task force: "I think that story was something where prejudices and stereotypes about so-called elite liberal institutions could very easily be latched onto . . . and showed me there is a narrative that has been mapped onto the ROTC debate."
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write publications@cfr.org.
What is the effect of U.S. domestic political gridlock on international relations?
The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces
Special operations play a critical role in how the United States confronts irregular threats, but to have long-term strategic impact, the author argues, numerous shortfalls must be addressed.
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
Why do mass shootings, such as the December 2012 incident at a Connecticut elementary school, occur more frequently in the United States than...
The Pentagon's new strategic review signals a shift toward the Asia-Pacific region and calls for a leaner fighting force at a time when the...
President Barack Obama and South Korean President Park Geun-hye held a press conference on May 7, 2013. They discussed trade and threats from...
Under the security cooperation agreement called the Merida Initiative, the United States provides military and law enforcement assistance to...