Jerome A. Cohen argues, "The [Chinese] mainland will only establish genuine rule of law by limiting political and personal interference."

Jerome A. Cohen argues that as China rises, foreigners need to keep protesting against cases of injustice on the mainland.

Jerome A. Cohen and Oliver Zhong discuss how during a recent murder trial in China, public sentiment played a role in the judicial process.

Jerome Cohen criticizes China's controversial decision to execute Akmal Shaikh, a British subject of Pakistani descent.

Jerome Cohen and Eva Pils examine the fate of various lawyers in China whose sufferings "tell us much about the lack of progress to establish the rule of law."

Jerome Cohen examines the excruciating decisions--particularly those regarding publicity--facing the families of overseas Chinese detained on the mainland.

"Can contemporary Chinese political culture sustain a constitutional court?" asks Jerome Cohen, pointing to the Taiwanese Council of Grand Justices as a model for China to consider.

In response to the Taiwanese Pime Minister's comment that political critics who do not live in Taiwan cannot understand the country, Jerome Cohen argues that "foreign critics are useful precisely because their distance gives them a different perspective."

In light of the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the People's Republic, Jerome Cohen writes that although China has made great strides, "getting to this point has not been easy."

Jerome A. Cohen comments, "In China, bail is not an individual right designed to minimize restraints on freedom but an alternative pre-trial coercive measure."

Jerome A. Cohen states, "Imposing artificial 'stability' at the expense of justice can no longer work for a changing China."

Jerome A Cohen and Jeremy Daum comment on China's efforts to reform its "state secrets" laws.

Jerome A. Cohen and Yu-Jie Chen argue that leading Taiwan's KMT party is an opportunity for President Ma Ying-jeou.

Jerome A. Cohen argues, "Two cases involving 'state secrets' highlight the huge gap between legal procedures in China and the US."

Jerome A. Cohen argues, "mainland rights lawyers are risking careers, liberty, and even their lives by taking 'sensitive' cases."

Jerome A. Cohen argues, "the term 'court of public opinion' is being taken literally in some parts of the mainland."

Jerome A. Cohen and Yu-Jie Chen discuss the incorporation of two human rights covenants into Taiwan's domestic law.

Jerome A. Cohen discusses the one year anniversary of the Sichuan earthquake.

Jerome A. Cohen discusses the National Human Rights Act of China, and the gap between its language and its practice.

Jerome A. Cohen discusses the implications of United States vs. Stevens for Taiwan's legal system.