image

Matthew C. Waxman

Adjunct Senior Fellow for Law and Foreign Policy

Expertise

International law & national security law; law and terrorism; counterterrorism; international security; presidential powers and foreign policy; cybersecurity; military intervention.

Programs

U.S. Foreign Policy Program

Featured Publications

Video Speaker: Matthew C. Waxman

Civil liberties will present the winner of the 2012 U.S. presidential elections with challenges related to counterterrorism powers and practices, as well as challenges related to privacy rights, says CFR's Matthew C. Waxman.

See more in U.S. Election 2012

Council Special Report No. 49

Intervention to Stop Genocide and Mass Atrocities

Author: Matthew C. Waxman

Recent events in Darfur raise the familiar question of whether international law facilitates the kind of early, decisive, and coherent action needed to effectively combat genocide. Matthew C. Waxman argues that putting decisions about international intervention solely in the hands of the UN Security Council risks undermining the threat or use of intervention when it may be most potent in stopping mass atrocities.

See more in United States, Humanitarian Intervention

All Publications

Interview

Shahzad Arrest Ignites Liberties Debate

Matthew C. Waxman interviewed by Bernard Gwertzman

The Times Square bomb plot has triggered questions about when and whether suspect Faisal Shahzad, a Pakistan-born American citizen, should have been informed of his Miranda rights. These questions are likely to gain traction in the weeks ahead, says expert Matthew C. Waxman, who believes it would be wrong to treat all captured terrorists as enemy combatants subject to military trial.

See more in United States, Terrorism and the Law

Council Special Report No. 49

Intervention to Stop Genocide and Mass Atrocities

Author: Matthew C. Waxman

Recent events in Darfur raise the familiar question of whether international law facilitates the kind of early, decisive, and coherent action needed to effectively combat genocide. Matthew C. Waxman argues that putting decisions about international intervention solely in the hands of the UN Security Council risks undermining the threat or use of intervention when it may be most potent in stopping mass atrocities.

See more in United States, Humanitarian Intervention