Barry J. Eichengreen
George & Helen Pardee Professor of Economics & Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
Publications
"Europe's leaders were right about the pressure. Monetary union without banking union will not work, and a workable banking union requires at least some elements of fiscal and political union. But they were wrong about the irresistible part. There is no inevitability about what comes next."
See more in EU, Economics
Confidence in the dollar and the euro continues to falter, threatening the international monetary system.
See more in North America, Economics
The thirteenth Geneva Report on the World Economy addresses fiscal consolidation policy.
See more in United States, EU, Japan, Financial Crises
The economic crisis is hurting the world's top currency. But the pound, the yen, the euro, the renminbi, and the IMF's accounting currency are no match for the dollar. At least for now.
See more in International Finance
Barry Eichengreen comments on the need for IMF reform and addresses exactly how this should happen.
See more in International Finance, IMF
A summary of the various economic explanations for why the United States has been able to run such a large current account deficit for the past few years.
See more in United States, Economics
This book asks whether transatlantic economic relations will move toward increased conflict or collaboration: Will policymakers in Europe and the United States be encouraged by their mutual interests to collaborate in the pursuit of common goals? Or will competition fan conflict and recrimination?
See more in Western Europe, Economics
This paper compares and contrasts three distinct periods of sudden decline in international capital flows to developing countries: the 1930s, the 1980s, and the period following Mexico's sudden balance-of-payments crisis at the end of 1994. Three features are highlighted: 1) the differences in scope are noted; 2) the international response to the problems is differentiated from none to an active role for the International Monetary Fund to direct response by the United States; and 3) the difference in recipient country reaction.
See more in Economics
See more in International Law