Backgrounder

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite
Style:MLAAPAChicagoClose

loading...

The Role of the UN General Assembly

Author: CFR.org Staff
Updated: September 20, 2013

Introduction

Since its inception more than sixty years ago, the United Nations General Assembly has been a forum for lofty declarations, sometimes audacious rhetoric, and rigorous debate over the world's most vexing issues, from poverty and development to peace and security. As the deliberative and representative organ of the United Nations, the assembly holds general debate in the UN's New York headquarters from September to December, with special sessions convened thereafter as required.

The sixty-eighth session of the General Assembly opened on September 17, 2013, with heads of state and government convening for the general debate on September 24. With the target date for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) coming up in 2015, development is at the top of the official agenda. High-level meetings on the sidelines of the debate will discuss incorporating disability rights into the MDGs, promoting sustainable development, and moving forward in the post-2015 era.

Share

The official agenda was likely to be overshadowed, however, by the mounting crisis in Syria and newly elected Iranian president Hassan Rouhani's debut in New York. The general debate begins one week after UN chemical weapons inspectors submitted their report confirming the use of chemical weapons in the Damascus suburbs a month prior, while the United States and Russia are calling for the UN Security Council to pass a resolution on the elimination of Syria's chemical weapons stocks. In marked contrast with his predecessor, Rouhani has taken a conciliatory tone in the weeks before the General Assembly, and raised the possibility of Iran mediating in the Syrian conflict.

What is the UN General Assembly?

The UN General Assembly (UNGA) is the only universally representative body of the five principal organs of the United Nations. The other major bodies are the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, the Secretariat, and the International Court of Justice. As delineated in the Charter of the United Nations, the function of the General Assembly is to discuss, debate, and make recommendations on a range of subjects pertaining to international peace and security--including disarmament, human rights, international law, and peaceful arbitration between disputing nations.

It elects the nonpermanent members of the Security Council and other bodies such as the Human Rights Council, and appoints the secretary-general based on the Security Council's recommendation. It considers reports from the other four organs of the United Nations, assesses the financial situations of member states, and approves the UN budget--its most concrete role. The Assembly also works with the Security Council to elect the judges of the International Court of Justice.

What is the General Assembly's membership?

The General Assembly is the only part of the United Nations that represents all 193 member states, each of which has one vote. The assembly's president changes with each annual session. The president of the sixty-eighth session is John W. Ashe [PDF] of Antigua and Barbuda.

Often voting blocs are formed around groups such as the G77, a loose coalition of member states from the developing world. Resolutions need a two-thirds majority to pass. In addition, the UN's nonmember observer states, which include the Vatican, have the right to speak at assembly meetings but cannot vote on resolutions.

Membership can at times be a contentious issue. Taiwan has been denied UN membership for more than two decades due to objections from China, which holds a permanent seat on the Security Council and considers Taiwan part of its sovereign territory. More recently, the 2011 General Assembly session was dominated by a controversial bid for recognition of Palestine as a member state, which stalled in the Security Council after the United States vowed to veto.

In 2012, the Palestinian Authority has announced that it would seek to upgrade its current non-member observer entity status (YNetNews) to non-member observer state status. This change would give the territory, which has disputed statehood, a similar status to that of the Vatican and allow it to serve on various UN bodies. (In October 2011, UNESCO voted to admit Palestine as a full member state, prompting both the United States and Israel to cut off funds to the Paris-based organization.)

Is the General Assembly in need of reform?

Yes, say many UN experts and leading donor nations. Efforts towards revitalizing its work have been ongoing for many years. Key motivating factors (PDF) are considered to be increasing the power of the assembly vis-à-vis the Security Council, as well as making debates more constructive and less repetitive. But, the assembly has continued to resist deep-seated reforms, a reflection of the rift between its many members from the developing world, who want to retain a strong say in its deliberations, and wealthy nations that serve as its main donors. Small improvements do take place, however. In April 2007, the General Assembly, for the first time in sixty years, mandated a significant overhaul of the UN system of internal justice, declaring it "slow, cumbersome, ineffective and lacking in professionalism." The new system, which became functional in 2009, formally established a mediation division within the UN. The Internal Justice Council has already begun interviewing potential judges to ensure their independence.

Global Governance Monitor

In 2005, then Secretary-General Kofi Annan presented a report that criticized the assembly for focusing excessively on consensus and passing resolutions that reflected "the lowest common denominator" of opinions. Michael W. Doyle, an international affairs expert who teaches at Columbia University, says the assembly is "an important institution that has never quite sorted out its role" in terms of being a truly deliberative, functional body, and has "insufficient deliberation and not enough genuine discussion." Doyle, who was an aide to Annan, says that the assembly could enhance its relevance by holding hearings with expert testimony. The assembly has made an effort in recent years to make its work more substantive and relevant. Resolution 59/313, adopted in 2005, established a more influential role for the assembly's president to help achieve this goal.

Have members ever been punished by the assembly?

The General Assembly has the power of censuring states for violating UN Charter principles. In the 1960s the assembly refused to seat the South African delegations because the country was practicing apartheid, in violation of both Security Council resolutions and principles of international law. In 1992, the assembly refused to give Serbia the former Yugoslavian seat in the assembly. Belgrade later was given representation under the name of Yugoslavia.

Separately, Israel for many years was barred from serving on UN commissions and panels because Arab states blocked it from meeting with the Mideast regional group at the United Nations. This changed in 2000 when Israel was permitted into another regional group.

In August 2012, the General Assembly voted 133-12 to strongly denounce the Syrian government for the killings and atrocities that have occurred since the start of the Syrian uprising in March 2011. Thirty-three countries abstained from voting on the resolution, which was overwhelmingly backed by Western countries and their allies.

What are some noteworthy assembly actions?

"The General Assembly is not an action body. It is just that--an assembly," says Ambassador Donald McHenry, former U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations. On some issues, such as the U.S. embargo on Cuba, resolutions get passed every year, but have yet to stir policy change. General Assembly resolutions are still significant, however, as indicators of Member States' positions on a given issue. They can also prove useful by outlining organizing principles and proposing initiatives for Member States, says McHenry. Some assembly actions have had more influence or incited more opposition than others:

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In 1948, two years after the assembly convened its inaugural session, it promulgated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which contained thirty articles stating the UN's view on human rights. A historic act, it proclaimed the "inherent dignity" and "equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family." The assembly called for the act to be "disseminated, displayed, read, and expounded" in the schools and educational institutions of all member countries. As the Chair of the UN's Commission on Human Rights, former U.S. First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt helped to draft and pass the declaration, saying it "may well become the international Magna Carta for all men everywhere." Human rights issues remain contentious, however. And as this CFR Backgrounder points out, the UN Human Rights Council continues to face criticism for, among other things, allowing countries with poor human rights standards to be members.
  • "Uniting for Peace" Resolution. In 1950, the United States initiated another landmark resolution of the General Assembly, Resolution 377 (PDF), known as the "Uniting for Peace" Resolution. It states that if the UN Security Council "fails to exercise its primary responsibility" of maintaining international peace and security, the General Assembly can and should take up the matter itself and urge member states to consider collective action. The assembly has enacted this resolution in a handful of instances, including the Suez crisis of 1956. As a result of its intervention there, a ceasefire was called, a withdrawal occurred, and the first United States Emergency Force (USEF), a peacekeeping force, was established. The U.S.-initiated war with Iraq provoked calls from a number of organizations, including the legal advocacy organization the Center for Constitutional Rights, to have the General Assembly take up the issue and override the impasse of the Security Council, but the assembly has not done so.
  • Millennium Declaration. The General Assembly proclaimed that its fifty-fifth session in 2000 would be designated the Millennium Assembly. At a summit that year, Annan unveiled the UN's Millennium Declaration. It set forth what are known as the Millennium Development Goals, a collection of "time-bound and measurable" targets for combating everything from poverty to HIV/AIDS. Other key proposals included a security agenda relating to international law, peace operations, and small arms trafficking; and an environmental agenda that urged "a new ethic of conservation and stewardship." The development goals continue to be invoked by many governments, NGOs, and other groups as a way to spur more aid towards the developing world. As of 2010, there are just five years left to meet targets. So far, significant inroads have been made on education, infant mortality, and poverty. However, a 2009 UN report found that achievements such as fighting extreme poverty and hunger (PDF) have likely stalled because of skyrocketing food prices and the 2008 financial crisis. The report calls for accelerated efforts to eradicate hunger and poverty and more forceful global action on climate change.
  • 'Zionism is Racism' Resolution of 1975. Also known as Resolution 3379, this is the assembly's most controversial resolution, in which it "determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination." Yet the UN Partition Plan for Palestine approved of and helped create the state of Israel in 1947. In his address to the UN General Assembly on the day the resolution was passed, Israeli ambassador Chaim Herzog stated that, "for us, the Jewish people, this resolution based on hatred, falsehood and arrogance, is devoid of any moral or legal value." He then proceeded to tear it in half. Resolution 3379 was eventually repealed, in 1991. In 2001 during the UN's world conference on combatting racism in Durban, South Africa, similar language on Zionism was introduced but later dropped. Still, the 2011 meeting commemorating the Durban conference is expected to be boycotted by the United States, Canada, Australia, Israel, and at least six European nations because of concerns it could become "a vehicle for Israel-bashing" (AP).

Leo Schwartz contribued to this report.

More on This Topic

Primary Sources

IPCC Assessment Report

The main activity of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is to publish regular reports on the state of knowledge about climate...