Author: Kenneth N. Waltz
July/August 2012
Foreign Affairs
U.S. and Israeli officials have declared that a nuclear-armed Iran is a uniquely terrifying prospect, even an existential threat. In fact, by creating a more durable balance of military power in the Middle East, a nuclear Iran would yield more stability, not less.
Request permission to republish or photocopy this Foreign Affairs article.
Facebook Twitter LinkedInWhat effect would the fall of the Assad regime have on U.S. policy towards Syria?
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
This week's latest round of Iran talks seems to have done little to reconcile the two sides on the country's nuclear position, says CFR's...
Micah Zenko argues that the ouster of Muammar al-Qaddafi will motivate other dictators to seek out nuclear weapons.
Matthew Kroenig argues that the world will not be safer if the United States had no nuclear weapons.
Sheila A. Smith says that Japan must go beyond its commitment to reduce its own nuclear weapons and play a more active global role in...
Print
Email
Share
Cite
