PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite


Iran Wins a Round in Iraq

Author: Mohamad Bazzi, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
July 22, 2010
New York Daily News


On Monday, the anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr met with Iyad Allawi, who is vying to become Iraq's next prime minister after his coalition narrowly won parliamentary elections in March.

It might seem like a minor development in the endless political jockeying over forming a stable government in Iraq. But, in fact, this meeting was a victory for Iran and another setback for the United States.

As the Iranian regime suppressed internal dissent over the tainted reelection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, it also worked to maintain its influence over Iraq's Shiite factions. By surviving an internal challenge, the so-called Green Revolution, the Iranian regime has become stronger and more emboldened to engage in adventurism abroad.

Sadr, who is most popular among young, impoverished Shiites, has helped Iran extend its influence over Iraq. He is positioning himself as the kingmaker who may well determine the political fates of Allawi and the current prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, who is fighting to keep his job. Sadr's meeting with Allawi took place in Damascus and was arranged by Syrian President Bashar Assad, another ally of Iran.

View full text of article.

More on This Topic


Ferguson-Scowcroft Conference Call

Speakers: Charles D. Ferguson and Lieutenant General Brent Scowcroft

This Council on Foreign Relations press conference call discussed the release of the report of the independent task force on U.S. nuclear...


A New Approach to Iran's Nukes

Author: Charles D. Ferguson
Christian Science Monitor

Charles Ferguson proposes a "potential trust-building deal that would bind the United States and other nuclear energy states to Iran as...

Must Read

WSJ: Toward a Nuclear-Free World

Authors: George P. Shultz, William J. Perry, Henry A. Kissinger, and Sam Nunn

George Shultz, William Perry, Henry Kissinger and Sam Nunn say the concept of mutually assured destruction has long outlived its usefulness.