First Take

PrintPrint CiteCite
Style: MLAAPAChicago Close


Iran's Sketchy Uranium Deal

Author: Michael A. Levi, David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment and Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies
May 17, 2010

Iran's Sketchy Uranium Deal - irans-sketchy-uranium-deal


The Iranian nuclear "deal" announced on May 17 is an exceedingly odd one: It includes only one of the parties to the underlying dispute. The United States and its European partners are now in an uncomfortable jam.

The fuel-swap deal agreed to (Guardian) last October--before Iran scuttled it (AFP)--was never intended to solve the nuclear problem brought on by Iran's insistence on developing a uranium enrichment program (which gives it the option of building a nuclear arsenal). The goal was to jumpstart diplomatic negotiations while building mutual confidence. This new plan may do the former (though neither Iran nor anyone else has promised to return to the table), but it will not do the latter.

Iran says that it will continue to enrich uranium to 20 percent, in flagrant violation of UN Security Council demands, helping strengthen its ability to covertly produce highly enriched uranium. And the way the "deal" has been announced--it is designed to squeeze the United States by making it look like the bad guy if it says no--certainly will not build any confidence.

The announcement, made by Brazil and Turkey,  obviously complicates (Politico) efforts to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran. It also signals problems for the ongoing NPT Review Conference. The United States and its allies would (reasonably) like an agreement that states in violation of the NPT be barred from trade in sensitive technologies. But the announcement affirms a "right of all State Parties, including the Islamic Republic of Iran, to develop research, production, and use of nuclear energy (as well as nuclear fuel cycle including enrichment activities) for peaceful purposes without discrimination." This augurs poorly for Brazilian cooperation on any enrichment constraints.

The right choice for the United States may ultimately involve welcoming the announced fuel swap. But the political difference between this and the deal that was struck last October is stark. No one should breathe easier about the Iranian program as a result.

More on This Topic


Turmoil in Turkey

Speakers: Steven A. Cook and Ömer Taspinar
Presider: F. Stephen Larrabee

Steven Cook and Ömer Taşpinar examine the recent unrest and its implications for Turkey's neighbors and U.S. policy.


Turkey Still Needs the West

Author: Walter Russell Mead
American Interest

Walter Russell Mead says that Turkey and Brazil's rejection of UN sanctions against Iran revealed that neither country had mastered the...

First Take

Why Brazil is a Broker with Iran

Author: Matias Spektor

It is not yet clear whether a Brazil-brokered deal will complicate or help resolve the crisis over Iran's nuclear program. CFR's Matias...