Print
Email
Share
CiteOn Iran, It’s Time for Obama to Set Clear Lines for Military Action
Jamie Fly and Matthew Kroenig argue that drawing red lines linked to the guaranteed use of force by Washington and its allies could be the...
Speaker: Matthew H. Kroenig, Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations
January 24, 2012
The European Union's embargo on Iranian oil is unlikely to cause economic pressure on Iran severe enough to compel it to compromise on its controversial nuclear program, says CFR's Matthew Kroenig, an expert on nuclear security. The EU's decision to phase in the embargo over the next six months is problematic, Kroenig says, since "it also provides Iran time to find workarounds, which lessens the economic impact on the Iranian economy." China's unwillingness to go along with the embargo further reduces its effectiveness, Kroenig says. "This is a problem because China is the biggest importer of Iranian oil, importing about twenty percent of all Iranian oil exports," he says.
Kroenig argues that while international economic pressure may result in "a high probability that Iran will come to the negotiating table in the near future, it's hard to imagine Iran and the West coming to some kind of an agreement." With a diplomatic solution unlikely, he says, "the United States and the West are going to be left with a set of less attractive options."
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write publications@cfr.org.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedInWhat effect would the fall of the Assad regime have on U.S. policy towards Syria?
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
The biggest threat to America's security and prosperity comes not from abroad but from within, writes CFR President Richard N. Haass in his provocative and important new book. More
Capitalism and Inequality: Why both the left and right get it wrong
General Stanley McChrystal on the U.S. war on terror
The U.S.-Pakistan alliance: Why it should end
subscribe nowPublished by the Council on Foreign Relations since 1922
Jamie Fly and Matthew Kroenig argue that drawing red lines linked to the guaranteed use of force by Washington and its allies could be the...
CFR Senior Fellows Ray Takeyh and Matthew Kroenig discuss the escalating tension with Iran and the challenges it poses for US strategy in...
CFR fellows Matthew Kroenig, Elliot Abrams and Ray Takeyh discuss the findings of the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency...
A take-it-or-leave-it deal by the United States on the nuclear issue is the wrong strategy, says Ray Takeyh.