Op-Ed

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite
Style:MLAAPAChicagoClose

loading...

Would a Nuclear Armed Iran Really Be So Dangerous?

Authors: Matthew Fuhrmann, Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, 2010-2011, and Todd S. Sechser, 2011-2012 Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow
January 12, 2011
Christian Science Monitor

Share

One of the biggest surprises to emerge from the ongoing WikiLeaks fiasco is that Arab leaders, including Saudi King Abdullah, have been banging the drums of war, calling for American preventive strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. Yet calls for military force are based on incorrect assertions about what the world would look like if Iran built nuclear weapons.

Advocates of the military option routinely make two claims. The first is that a nuclear-armed Iran would be able to blackmail its neighbors. The second is that other countries would be forced to capitulate to Iran's demands. Both assumptions are wrong.

Nukes and threats: what history shows

A close look at the history of the nuclear age shows that countries with nuclear weapons are neither more likely to make coercive threats nor more likely to succeed in blackmailing their adversaries. Nuclear powers such as the United States and the Soviet Union certainly made numerous threats after they acquired nuclear weapons. But so did Libya, Serbia, Turkey, Iraq, Venezuela, and dozens of other countries that did not possess the bomb. Nuclear weapons are not a prerequisite for engaging in military blackmail.

View full text of article.

More on This Topic

Op-Ed

On Iran, There's Time

Author: Ray Takeyh
Los Angeles Times

A take-it-or-leave-it deal by the United States on the nuclear issue is the wrong strategy, says Ray Takeyh.

Op-Ed

The Projectionist

Author: Micah Zenko
Foreign Policy

Micah Zenko says even though telling the United States that it should be more scared of Iran has failed so far, Israeli officials will...

Foreign Affairs Article

Iran and the Bomb

Authors: Colin H. Kahl and Kenneth N. Waltz

A nuclear-armed Iran would not make the Middle East more secure, argues Colin Kahl; it would yield more terrorism and pose a risk of a...