Preserving Progress: Transitioning Authority and Implementing the Strategic Framework in Iraq
Max Boot testifies before the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia on the future of the U.S. relationship with Iraq.
Interviewee: Michael Wahid Hanna, Program Officer, The Century Foundation
Interviewer: Greg Bruno, Staff Writer, CFR.org
December 29, 2008
On paper Iraq's penal code has striking similarities to Western criminal law: Suspects have the right to a fair trial, the right to an attorney, and are innocent until proven guilty. But in practice, Iraqi justice is a work in progress, with long trial delays and frequent allegations of coerced confessions, experts say. These shortcomings are expected to become more pronounced in 2009, when Iraqi authorities assume control of all detainees taken into custody by Iraqi and American forces (a change mandated under the security agreement signed between Washington and Baghdad in December 2008).
Michael Wahid Hanna, a program officer at The Century Foundation who spent May 2008 conducting field research for Human Rights Watch on Iraq's justice system, says despite the official handover of legal jurisdiction, Iraq's legal system remains besieged by "major systemic and structural problems."Hanna says lengthy pretrial detentions; an overreliance on shoddy evidence or secret informants; allegations of abuse; and insufficient access to defense attorneys are endemic failures that will take time and continued U.S. support to improve. His findings are detailed in a new Human Rights Watch report (PDF), released in December 2008.
Despite the official handover of legal responsibilities on January 1, 2009, Hanna says the U.S. military will likely continue to keep Iraqi prisoners in custody because Iraq's detention facilities don't have the capacity. While necessary in the short term, this arrangement could become a future source of friction between Washington and Baghdad in the event that disagreements over the handling of specific prisoners arise.
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write outreach@cfr.org.
Saudi Arabia on the Edge
A leading Middle East scholar pens this "good introduction to the Saudi paradox of social change and political stability and an invaluable guide to the challenges the country faces." More
American Force
An investigation of the use of American force since the end of the Cold War. More
The Struggle for Egypt
A sweeping account of Egypt in the modern era: what Egypt is, what it stands for, and its relation to the world. More
Saudi Arabia in the New Middle East
Gause posits that, though the Arab Awakening has caused tensions in Saudi-American relations, the two countries do not face a crisis and still have significant mutual interests that should be prioritized.
Partners in Preventive Action
The authors assess the strengths and weaknesses of international institutions and provide a set of practical recommendations for how the United States can strengthen the global architecture for preventive action by partnering with those organizations.
Max Boot testifies before the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia on the future of the U.S. relationship with Iraq.
Saddam Hussein’s death may have little influence on the ongoing insurgency and sectarian violence, but beyond Iraq’s borders it may portend...
Official optimism runs high amid improved security and a growing role for Iraqi forces, but analysts caution against premature celebrations.
The Iraq war has confounded and surprised U.S. policymakers over five years, and is expected to remain a challenge for a new administration.