Article

PrintPrint EmailEmail ShareShare CiteCite
Style:MLAAPAChicagoClose

loading...

Testing the Surge: Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007?

Authors: Stephen Biddle, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Defense Policy, Jeffrey A. Friedman, and Jacob Shapiro, Princeton University
Summer 2012
International Security

Share

Abstract:

Why did violence decline in Iraq in 2007? Many policymakers and scholars credit the "surge," or the program of U.S. reinforcements and doctrinal changes that began in January 2007. Others cite the voluntary insurgent stand-downs of the Sunni Awakening or say that the violence had simply run its course with the end of a wave of sectarian cleansing; still others credit an interaction between the surge and the Awakening. The difference matters for policy and scholarship, yet this debate has not moved from hypothesis to test. An assessment of the competing claims based on recently declassified data on violence at local levels and information gathered from seventy structured interviews with coalition participants finds little support for the cleansing or Awakening theses. Instead, a synergistic interaction between the surge and the Awakening was required for violence to drop as quickly and widely as it did: both were necessary; neither was sufficient. U.S. policy thus played an important role in reducing the violence in Iraq in 2007, but Iraq provides no evidence that similar methods will produce similar results elsewhere without local equivalents of the Sunni Awakening.

View full text of article (Subscription required).

More on This Topic

Video

Iraq: Three Years After the Invasion

Speakers: Stephen Biddle, Noah R. Feldman, and Steven Simon
Presider: Jane Arraf

Watch three Council on Foreign Relations scholars discuss the situation in Iraq three years after the U.S.-led invasion on March 19, 2003.