In this New York Times Op-Ed, Veerabhadran Ramanathan and David G. Victor argue that delegates meeting for climate change talks in Cancún should take a few immediate, practical actions to have an effect on the climate in the coming decades.

Manish Bapna, the Executive Vice President of the World Resources Institute, discusses the future of climate change developments in India.

The latest national survey conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that opinions about global warming have changed little over the past year.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has analyzed the research on the effects that policies to reduce greenhouse gases would have on employment.

The Economist offers two explanations for the failure of carbon markets to take off. One is that the markets had already priced in the likelihood of seeing neither a deal in Copenhagen nor a cap-and-trade bill on Barack Obama's desk. Another is that their long-term prospects remain reasonable, if humble.

This Belfer Center publication stresses the importance of linking the efforts of governments, the private sector, and nongovernmental organizations to combat climate change.  It provides a concise overview of international initiatives, multilateral groups' efforts, and various partnerships and offers insights on how to move forward. 

Ben Casselman and Guy Chazan report on offshore drilling by big oil companies that is made possible by their technological and financial advantages.

Barbara Crosette explains why India often gives global governance the biggest headache.

This publication from Harvard University’s Belfer Center addresses the challenges in reaching an effective international climate agreement, particularly the cost and uncertainty associated with renegotiating commitments, and offers several suggestions for improving the effectiveness of international climate agreements.

British Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Ed Miliband discusses the progress made at Copenhagen.

Robert N. Stavins of the Belfer Center at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government assesses the Copenhagen Accord. He examines expectations leading up to the Copenhagen climate summit and explores procedural routes ahead.

In a Washington Post analysis, Anthony Faiola, Juliet Eilperin, and John Pomfret explain why the Copenhagen talks are an indication that a new world order may be forming with increasing power given to China.

David Corn and Kate Sheppard report on the varied reactions to President Obama's role in forming an agreement on climate change in Copenhagen.

This article examines how the impacts of climate change on China, and China's response, will drive security challenges domestically, as well as in the greater Asian region and around the world.

Senators John Kerry and Lindsey Graham outline the steps needed to achieve passage of climate change legislation in Congress.

Reuters tracks the negotiating positions of the top five greenhouse gas emitters ahead of the December UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.

Newsweek's Katie Connolly examines the outlook on climate change legislation in the U.S. senate.

David Victor and Richard Morse examine the economic and political challenges of managing global reliance on coal and reducing coal emissions, and suggest a three-front focus for new global warming policies.

The 2010 World Development Report explains how climate change can hinder economic growth and says high-income nations need to reduce their carbon footprints and assist devleoping nations in switching to lower-carbon paths.

Madhur Singh places India's intransigence on climate negotiations into perspective, explaining how any international climate change framework will have to be acceptable among all nations.