Max Boot and Benn Steil argue that a Trump presidency would undermine the liberal international order which the United States painstakingly constructed and cultivated after the Second World War. This would, they believe, gravely damage America’s security and standing in the world.
The Islamic Republic is about to hold its first elections since an international agreement was reached over its nuclear program. At stake, in theory at least, is control of parliament and the Assembly of Experts.
Why are Republican presidential candidates denigrating the U.S. military? Micah Zenko analyzes the negative language candidates have used, and how it differs from the perceptions of senior military officials.
Foreign policy generally has little effect on elections, writes CFR's Elizabeth Saunders. But while foreign policy may only feature occasionally in the 2016 campaign, the voters' chosen candidate will matter significantly for U.S. foreign policy.
Drawing on his government experience in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, John Bellinger argues that the specter of terrorist attacks should never be used to promote fear mongering or xenophobic policies.
On the upcoming South Korean presidential election, Scott A. Snyder says the determining vote will be "South Korea's bulging forties cohort" that played a critical role in South Korea's transition from authoritiarianism to democracy and also has the greatest stake in its economic stability.
James M. Lindsay says Obama's and Romney's views on foreign policy are broadly similar—both men are internationalists with a strong pragmatic streak, and they largely agree on the chief threats the United States faces overseas. Their differences are primarily over details, tactics, and tone.
Learn more about CFR’s mission and its work over the past year in the 2015 Annual Report. The Annual Report spotlights new initiatives, high-profile events, and authoritative scholarship from CFR experts, and includes a message from CFR President Richard N. Haass. Read and download »