Print
Email
Share
CiteDrawing Down in Afghanistan
The Pentagon's plan for an end to U.S. combat operations in Afghanistan by the end of 2013 has drawn familiar battle lines in the public...
Speaker: James M. Lindsay, Senior Vice President and Director of Studies, Council on Foreign Relations
April 3, 2012
On April 4, 1949, the United States and eleven European countries met in Washington, DC, and signed the North Atlantic Treaty. By helping to create the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the United States signaled that it would not retreat into "Fortress America" as it had after World War I.
The decision to remain engaged was made in part because U.S. policymakers feared an expansionist Soviet Union, particularly after Moscow orchestrated the overthrow of Czechoslovakia's democratically elected government in March 1948. U.S. participation in NATO offered European nations protection from Soviet encroachment, and marked the first time in its history that the United States had made a peacetime military commitment to Europe.
James M. Lindsay, CFR's senior vice president and director of studies, argues that U.S. participation in NATO marked a fundamental shift in the course of U.S. foreign policy. However, he notes, undertaking such a shift can often prove difficult. "Countries at times do change the fundamental direction of their foreign policies," he says, "but usually only after much delay and in response to epic events." In NATO's case, he points out, the "United States abandoned its nineteenth century foreign policy only after two world wars." As U.S. policymakers today face a world that is "very different than the one that led to the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty," he invites us to consider whether another "fundamental rethinking of American foreign policy" may be necessary.
This video is part of Lessons Learned, a series dedicated to exploring historical events and examining their meaning in the context of foreign relations today.
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write publications@cfr.org.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedInWhat effect would the fall of the Assad regime have on U.S. policy towards Syria?
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
The biggest threat to America's security and prosperity comes not from abroad but from within, writes CFR President Richard N. Haass in his provocative and important new book. More
Capitalism and Inequality: Why both the left and right get it wrong
General Stanley McChrystal on the U.S. war on terror
The U.S.-Pakistan alliance: Why it should end
subscribe nowPublished by the Council on Foreign Relations since 1922
The Pentagon's plan for an end to U.S. combat operations in Afghanistan by the end of 2013 has drawn familiar battle lines in the public...
Max Boot says that while Qaddafi has fallen in Libya, it is too soon to tell whether Operation Unified Protector is a success.
Elliott Abrams argues that while the fall of Muammar al-Qaddafi is a victory, President Obama's failure to act sooner and more resolutely in...
Richard N. Haass says international assistance, and most likely an international force, is likely to be needed for some time to restore and...