U.S.-Pakistan Trust Deficit
Amid the latest spate of attacks in Pakistan, furor over a U.S. aid package shows continuing distrust between Washington and Islamabad. CFR's...
Interviewees: Isobel Coleman, Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy, Council on Foreign Relations
Charles North, Deputy Director, Pakistan and Afghanistan Taskforce, United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Interviewer: Jayshree Bajoria, Staff Writer, CFR.org
April 8, 2009
The new U.S. strategy to fight extremism in Pakistan recommends increasing development and economic assistance to the region. Since 2002, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the principal agency for disbursing U.S. development aid abroad, has been ramping up its program in Pakistan. For the last few years its annual spending in Pakistan has been $400 million; this year's budget is $590 million. USAID's deputy director for the region, Charles North, says education and health care are, and will continue to be, the top development priorities in Pakistan. As this Backgrounder points out, Pakistan spends only about 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) on education and 0.5 percent of GDP on health, resulting in notably low human development indicators.
But Isobel Coleman, CFR's senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy, says she sees the government in Islamabad as "largely dysfunctional" and is skeptical that it would prove to be an effective partner, which is "critical if these programs are to be successful."
Coleman also points out that aid delivery needs to be reformed, which will require better partnerships with local communities. Currently, as North points out, USAID is required to maintain high standards of financial accountability that make it difficult for it to work with local NGOs. "So often we need to work through international organizations that provide that kind of accounting for their resources," he says. But experts say this system of using contractors results in high overhead costs and large amounts of money being channeled back to donor countries. Coleman recommends that the U.S. Congress ease up on some of the accounting requirements. "It has to over time be able to get comfortable with losing money," she says.
Terms of Use: I understand that I may access this audio and/or video file solely for my personal use. Any other use of the file and its content, including display, distribution, reproduction, or alteration in any form for any purpose, whether commercial, noncommercial, educational, or promotional, is expressly prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner, the Council on Foreign Relations. For more information, write publications@cfr.org.
Why have many Muslim states struggled to achieve democracy?
The Future of U.S. Special Operations Forces
Special operations play a critical role in how the United States confronts irregular threats, but to have long-term strategic impact, the author argues, numerous shortfalls must be addressed.
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
The author analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance.
Amid the latest spate of attacks in Pakistan, furor over a U.S. aid package shows continuing distrust between Washington and Islamabad. CFR's...
Washington is focusing new military aid to Pakistan on strengthening counterinsurgency capabilities. But distrust between the two countries...
President Obama's strategy calls for increased development assistance to Pakistan. But implementation may face serious challenges amid...