home > think tank > research projects > Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy
October 6, 2006 - Special one day symposium
 |
| The program was made possible by a generous gift from Rita E. Hauser (shown here) and was organized in collaboration with the International Institute for Strategic Studies. |
The war in Iraq is “a supremely serious American initiative whose outcome will have equally serious implications for the ability of the United States to act in the world and influence events in the world in the coming years,” said Steven Simon, Council on Foreign Relations Hasib J. Sabbagh senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies, at a recent Council symposium, Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy. Though the symposium’s four sessions focused on different facets of U.S. policy affected by the war, speakers continually considered current options for the United States in Iraq. Most participants identified three main choices: immediate U.S. withdrawal, gradual U.S. withdrawal, or the partition of Iraq into three autonomous regions that would then lead to a U.S. exit. But Michael Gordon, the New York Times’ chief military correspondent, asked, “Why do you assume we get out?”
Meetings
Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: The U.S. and the Middle East (Session 1)
Related Project: Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy
| Speakers: | Toby Dodge, Senior Consulting Fellow for the Middle East, International Institute for Strategic Studies |
|---|---|
| Steven Simon, Hasib J. Sabbagh Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies, Council on Foreign Relations | |
| Shibley Telhami, Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development, University of Maryland | |
| Presider: | F. Gregory Gause III, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Vermont |
8:30 - 9:00 a.m. Breakfast Reception
9:00 - 10:15 a.m. Meeting
This program has been made possible by a generous gift from Rita E. Hauser.
Transcript: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy, Session 1: The United States and the Middle East [Rush Transcript; Federal News Service]
Audio: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy, Session 1: The United States and the Middle East (Audio)
Video: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy, Session 1: The United States and the Middle East (Video)
This meeting is on the record.
Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: The U.S., Europe, and Asia (Session 2)
Related Project: Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy
| Speakers: | Dana Allin, Carol Deane Senior Fellow, International Institute for Strategic Studies |
|---|---|
| Phillip C. Saunders, Senior Research Fellow, National Defense University | |
| Presider: | Philip Gordon, Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy, The Brookings Institution |
10:30 - 11:45 a.m. Meeting
This program has been made possible by a generous gift from Rita E. Hauser.
Transcript: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 2: The United States, Europe, and Asia [Rush Transcript; Federal News Service]
Audio: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 2: The United States, Europe, and Asia (Audio)
Video: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 2: The United States, Europe, and Asia (Video)
This meeting is on the record.
Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: The Direction of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy After the Intervention in Iraq (Session 3)
Related Project: Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy
| Speakers: | Michael R. Gordon, Chief Military Correspondent, New York Times |
|---|---|
| Ronald Steel, Professor of International Relations and History, University of Southern California | |
| Presider: | Walter Russell Mead, Henry A. Kissinger Senior Fellow for Foreign Policy, Council on Foreign Relations |
12:00 - 12:30 p.m. Lunch
12:30 - 1:30 p.m. Meeting
This program has been made possible by a generous gift from Rita E. Hauser.
Transcript: Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 3: "The Direction of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy after the Intervention in Iraq" [Rush Transcript; Federal News Service]
Audio: Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 3: "The Direction of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy after the Intervention in Iraq" (Audio)
Video: Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 3: "The Direction of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy after the Intervention in Iraq" (Video)
This meeting is on the record.
Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Coping with Rogue States, Failing States, and Proliferators (Session 4)
Related Project: Iraq's Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy
| Speakers: | Lawrence D. Freedman, Professor of War Studies, King's College, London |
|---|---|
| Steven E. Miller, Director, International Security Program, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University | |
| Presider: | Richard K. Betts, Adjunct Senior Fellow for National Security Studies, Council on Foreign Relations |
1:45 to 3:00 p.m. Meeting
This program has been made possible by a generous gift from Rita E. Hauser.
Transcript: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 4: Coping with Rogue States, Failing States, and Proliferators [Rush Transcript; Federal News Service]
Audio: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 4: Coping with Rogue States, Failing States, and Proliferators (Audio)
Video: Iraq’s Impact on the Future of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy: Session 4: Coping with Rogue States, Failing States, and Proliferators (Video)
This meeting is on the record.
Further Readings
The papers below are preprints of articles whose final and definitive form
has been published in Survival [2006-2007], © The International
Institute for Strategic Studies; the published versions are available at the journal's website.
DANA H. ALLIN
“American Power and Allied Restraint: Lessons of Iraq"
The assumption that Europeans are culturally inclined to appease our common
enemies coloured many American interpretations of the transatlantic crisis
over Iraq. One problem with these interpretations is that in the decade
leading up to the Iraq invasion, there was more convergence than divergence
in transatlantic attitudes toward humanitarian intervention, the use of
force and, indeed, the regime-changing war in Afghanistan.
American Power and Allied Restraint: Lessons of Iraq (.pdf)
TOBY DODGE
“The Causes of US Failure in Iraq"
Ever since US troops arrived in Baghdad on April 9 2003, Iraqi society has
been dominated by a profound security vacuum. This was created by two
interlinked dynamics that have driven the country towards civil war. The
primary cause of Iraq’s problems over the last three and a half years has
been the collapse of state infrastructure in the aftermath of the invasion.
The institutions of the Iraqi state had suffered from three wars since 1980
and over a decade of sanctions, specifically designed to strip them of
capacity. The three weeks of looting across the south and center of the
country in April 2003, pushed them over the edge of sustainability.
The Causes of US Failure in Iraq (.pdf)
LAWRENCE FREEDMAN
“Iraq, Liberal Wars and Illiberal Containment”
This paper considers the potential use of force in the aftermath of Iraq in
terms of the challenge posed to liberal values. While Iraq was discussed in
terms of the familiar tension within liberalism between its pro-justice and
anti-militarism tendencies, this war was uniquely mismanaged in terms of
speculative rationale, inept diplomacy and poor preparation for the
realities of occupation that to say it will not serve as a model for the
future is not to say much. Overstretched forces and diminished
international respect mean that there is a limited capacity for further
operations. Yet it should not be assumed that an “Iraq syndrome” will
develop along the lines of the “Vietnam syndrome” the 2003 war was supposed
to bury.
Iraq, Liberal Wars and Illiberal Containment (.pdf)
MICHAEL R. GORDON
“Break Point? Iraq and America's Military Forces”
The Bush Administration came to office with a program to transform the
military. The concept was outlined by George W. Bush in a 1999 speech when
he was still a candidate. Bush endorsed the notion, long-promoted in
conservative defense circles, that the United States faced an historic
possibility to exploit a revolution in military technology, one that would
enable American forces to use precision weapons, advanced reconnaissance
and sophisticated command and control systems to achieve battlefield
success with fewer troops. The long hot summer of 2003, however, taught a
painful strategic lesson.
Break Point? Iraq and America's Military Forces (.pdf)
STEVEN E. MILLER
“The Iraq Experiment and U.S. National Security”
After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the United States faced
an urgent need to address the potentially enormous threats that could arise
in the nexus of rogue states, radical terrorists, and nuclear
proliferation. In response, the Bush Administration adopted a set of bold
(but not novel) ideas that gave prominence to seizing the offensive, regime
change, and preventive war. This approach was believed to represent the
best way of eliminating intolerable or risky threats. The strategy was
actually put to the test in Iraq. How do these ideas look now given the
experience in Iraq?
The Iraq Experiment and U.S. National Security (.pdf)
PHILLIP C. SAUNDERS
“The United States and East Asia after Iraq”
The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and its violent aftermath have had an adverse
impact upon America’s geo-strategic position in East Asia, but to date the
consequences have been mitigated by a variety of countervailing factors.
Even though the U.S. army and marines are overstretched due to repeated
deployments, the U.S. military position in Asia rests primarily upon air
and sea power. The ongoing transformation of the U.S. military, realignment
of U.S. military bases and redeployment of forces, and efforts to transform
U.S. alliances with Japan and South Korea have arguably increased the U.S.
ability to project power in Asia. America’s Asian allies and partners
complain that U.S. leaders are distracted by Iraq and the war on terrorism,
and not devoting sufficient attention to Asia. The Iraq war has had a
negative impact on the U.S. image in Asia, but this has been partially
offset by the efforts of Asian governments to encourage increased U.S.
regional engagement to balance China’s growing economic and diplomatic
role.
The United States and East Asia after Iraq (.pdf)
STEVEN N. SIMON
"America and Iraq: The Case for Disengagement"
The United States lacks the military resources and the domestic and
international political support to master the situation in Iraq. Even if the United
States had the abundant ground forces and reconstruction teams necessary,
it is not clear that the situation in Iraq today is retrievable. Washington
has already achieved all that it is likely to achieve in Iraq: the removal
of Saddam, the end of the Ba’athist regime, the elimination of the Iraqi
regional threat, the snuffing out of Iraq’s unrequited aspiration to
weapons of mass destruction, and the opening of a door, however narrow, to
a constitutionally-based electoral democracy. Staying in Iraq can only
drive up the price of these gains in blood, treasure, and strategic
position.
America and Iraq: The Case for Disengagement (.pdf)
RONALD STEEL
“An Iraq Syndrome?"
The current American war in Iraq and the American war in Vietnam that ended
three decades ago have disturbing similarities. Both were wars against
ancient cultures alien to American understanding. Both gravely strained
America’s relations with traditional allies and provoked political schisms
within American society. Rather than being a traditional power conflict
with a rival state, both were publicly justified as struggles against an
ideology: communism in Vietnam, militant Islamism in Iraq. In the 1970s the
schisms provoked by the war in Asia led to what was labeled a Vietnam
syndrome: a revulsion against colonial peacekeeping, nation-building, and
costly and socially divisive military conflict in distant outposts not
directly related to American security. That syndrome faded during the shock
waves triggered by the terrorist attacks on American soil in 2001. But the
subsequent American invasion of Iraq, the high human and financial toll it
continues to take nearly four years later, and the public controversy over
the justification for the war have eroded domestic support for similar
future military interventions.
SHIBLEY TELHAMI
"America in Arab Eyes"
The American failure in Iraq has had important consequences on the
distribution of power in the Middle East, on America’s relationship with
states in the region, on the shape of Arab coalitions, and on Arab public
opinion more broadly. Coupled with the Lebanon war and the crisis in Gaza,
the Iraq war has revived public support for non-state actors in the region
and reduced public confidence in the existing order.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report outlines the nature of the challenges in Pakistan's tribal areas, formulates strategies for addressing those challenges, and distills the strategies into realistic policy proposals worthy of consideration by the incoming administration.
This report analyzes the debate over U.S. use of assurances against torture, explaining the contexts in which they are used, how they can be conveyed, and what they can contain, and recommends a number of ways to respond to criticism so that the United States can continue using assurances.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
For more information on the David Rockefeller Studies Program, contact:
Gary Samore
Vice President, Director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair
+1.212.434.9627
gsamore@cfr.org
Sebastian Mallaby
Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for
Geoeconomic Studies, Deputy Director of Studies, and Paul A. Volcker Senior
Fellow for International Economics
smallaby@cfr.org
Janine Hill
Deputy Director of Studies Administration
+1.212.434.9753
jhill@cfr.org
The David Rockefeller Studies Program is CFR’s “think tank.” Its work is integral to achieving CFR’s goal of contributing to the foreign policy debate. Fellows in the Studies Program do this by researching, writing, and commenting on the most important challenges facing the United States and the world.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
