home > by publication type > daily analysis > Questions Loom After Dubai Pullout
Email
| Prepared by: | Eben Kaplan |
|---|
The Port of Newark, one of six ports at the center of the Dubai debate. (Photo: AP)
In a globalized world, preserving national security while promoting economic strength is a daunting challenge for any nation's leadership. Determining the proper balance between these interests is at the heart of a debate that has raged in Washington in recent weeks. As explained in this CFR Background Q&A, the furor began when Dubai Ports World bought the British shipping company P&O, giving the United Arab Emirates-owned company control over terminals in six major U.S. ports. Originally slated to take effect March 2, the deal was postponed at the behest of Congress so that the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS), the body responsible for considering the security issues of foreign investment, could conduct a 45-day review. In the midst of the review, on March 9, Dubai Ports World bowed to continued pressure from Congress (LAT). The chief operating officer said in a statement the company will give up its stake in American ports and "transfer fully the U.S. operations...to a U.S. entity" (PDF).
The case of Dubai Ports World highlights the broader issue surrounding security of what is known as "critical infrastructure" in the United States. Foreign companies already are heavily invested in many of these sectors, as explained in this CFR Background Q&A. On March 2, Todd Malan, chief executive officer of the Organization for International Investment, told the House Financial Services Committee that foreign companies produce more than one-fifth of U.S. exports (PDF). One Congressional Research Service report looks at the process for weighing the security risks of foreign investments, while another examines the extent of such investments in the United States (PDF).
The debate in Congress has focused new attention on port security in general. Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee, CFR Senior Fellow Stephen Flynn said this is "long overdue given the enormous national security and economic security stakes." As political tensions subside, it remains imperative that policymakers stay focused on this larger issue (NYT).
The specifics of the new deal, including which U.S. company will take over, remain unknown. Also unclear is to what extent the maneuver will subdue the heated debate in Congress. More than a dozen bills (NPR) have emerged in the House and Senate in response to the initial deal. One far-reaching proposal (PDF), submitted by Representatives Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Jim Saxton (R-NJ), would essentially ban foreign ownership of critical U.S. infrastructure. The bill leaves "critical infrastructure" open to the interpretation of the Bush administration, which in a 2003 report (PDF) used the term to include such industries as food, water, energy, telecommunications, and banking.
For Dubai, the decision to cede control comes at a time when Dubai is taking big steps to enter the global economy. Youssef Ibrahim, a Dubai-based investment consultant and former Middle East correspondent for the New York Times, tells cfr.org's Bernard Gwertzman recent changes in Dubai are "nothing less than revolutionary."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.