Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > After Three Years of War, Concerns Abound
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
Iraqi soldiers inspect car bomb explosion (Photo: AP)
The professionalism of Iraq’s security forces has emerged as a chief concern as reports continue of abuses, lapses, and spiraling violence between Iraq’s Shiite and Sunni populations. The United States says it will expand its training of Iraqi police and security forces (LAT), amid reports of the kidnapping of some fifty security guards by gunmen wearing Iraqi police uniforms. Despite all the setbacks, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, speaking before Congress, said Iraq's security forces, not U.S. troops, would be able to handle an outbreak of civil war, should one occur (NYT).
The presence of sectarian militiamen in Iraq’s security forces, many of them Shiite, has destabilized the country, resulting in reprisal attacks, kidnappings, and prisoner abuses. That is the assessment of the State Department’s newly released human rights report on Iraq. The report admits that "since criminals, insurgents, and paramilitaries often wore police uniforms, data on actual police abuses was uncertain." Many analysts, including Brookings’ Kenneth Pollack, say militias are even more destabilizing than the insurgency. Matthew Sherman, a former Interior Ministry adviser, in an interview with cfr.org estimates the number of commandos within Iraq’s security forces with militia ties has jumped from roughly 6,000 to around 10,000 over the past year. Meanwhile, CFR Senior Fellow Stephen Biddle suggests decellerating the training of Iraqi troops and police units until a constitutional deal agreeable to all of Iraq’s ethnic groups is struck.
With the war approaching its three-year mark, cfr.org asked a number of experts, journalists, and military specialists: Is the United States winning or losing the war in Iraq? The general consensus is the U.S. military is losing, but the war is not lost. A new report by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments examines how reconstruction failures have undermined the war effort, while the Center for Strategic and International Studies and International Crisis Group in recent reports examine the main players within the insurgency.
Against this backdrop of growing violence, Iraq’s political leaders are still trying to put together a national-unity government, explained in this CFR Background Q&A. But Sunnis have voiced strong opposition to the choice of Ibrahim al-Jaafari for prime minister because of his alleged ties to Shiite militias. Finding some form of détente between the Shiite and Sunni communities will be paramount to avoiding all-out civil war and achieving political progress in Iraq, experts say. P. Walter Lang, former head of Middle East Policy and Counterterrorism at the Defense Intelligence Agency, told cfr.org that the recent spike in sectarian violence following the attack of a major Shiite shrine should not derail the political process.
A number of Arabists, including CFR Adjunct Senior Fellows Noah Feldman and Vali Nasr, assess in TIME the ongoing power struggles between these two groups. Contrary to media reports, Feldman says, "for the overwhelming majority of Iraqi history, Sunnis and Shiites have lived peacefully side by side." To be sure, it is not just Shiites and Sunnis vying for power in Iraq’s future government; Kurds and Christians will also play important roles, as these two CFR Background Q&As explain.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
