home > by publication type > daily analysis > Milosevic Haunts Justice System
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
A supporter mourns former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic (Photo: AP)
Slobodan Milosevic's death in a war crimes tribunal cell deprives many in the former Yugoslavia of seeing justice done to the man charged with orchestrating atrocities in the three major Balkan wars of the 1990s. It also may create more profound concerns among global human rights advocates, who saw the Milosevic trial in the Hague as an important experiment for the new permanent International Criminal Court. The nature of his death has already spawned controversy. A Dutch toxicologist says there are indications Milosevic died as a result of trying to manipulate his health (NYT) so he could seek treatment in Moscow.
Milosevic was the first former head of state to come before an international tribunal, his trial the crowning achievement of the Yugoslav war crimes court. His passing just weeks before the end of his trial is already seen by some as diminishing the legacy of what was called the most important court established in Europe (BBC) since the end of the Second World War. The UN Security Council established tribunals in the 1990s to prosecute perpetrators of genocide in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Human Rights Watch and other groups saw in them the pillars of a "lasting structure of global criminal justice." But the United States, which has lent enormous resources to the two Security Council-supported tribunals, remains vehemently opposed to the ICC, seeing it as tool for politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. service members. Meanwhile, another brutal leader who some think should have been tried by an international court — Saddam Hussein — instead faces charges in a domestic court whose legitimacy has been questioned by many who back the ICC.
Some U.S. legal skeptics of international tribunals say they hardly pose a deterrent to hardened war criminals. They point to Milosevic's campaign against Kosovo's Muslims in 1998-1999 even after the Hague tribunal had been in operation and to the ethnic cleansing of pro-government forces against civilians in Sudan's Darfur region.
These sentiments and donor fatigue have led the UN Security Council to mandate a "completion strategy" (PDF) in which the Hague tribunal must end all trials by the end of 2008 and all appeals by 2010. Council members insist they will support the tribunal in the event that suspected Bosnian war criminals Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic are apprehended, but that remains uncertain. Ten years after the Dayton Accords ended the bloodiest of the Yugoslav civil wars, the inability to try Karadzic and Mladic haunts Bosnia amid its painstaking efforts at consolidating a state.
In the case of Milosevic, much attention was paid to his courtroom theatrics, in berating jurists, and dismissing what he called NATO's victor's justice. But as Gary Bass notes in Foreign Affairs, the trial should be recognized for some great achievements—establishing Milosevic's role in the former Yugoslav wars and removing him from the Serbian political scene. Former U.S. diplomat Richard Holbrooke, architect of the Dayton Accords, says that while a verdict may have been denied, Milosevic was still rendered a form of "rough justice" (FT) by spending his last five years in jail hearing evidence of his crimes. As Belgrade contemplates losing Kosovo and Montenegro within the space of a year, the departure of Milosevic from the scene is not likely to be mourned too long.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.