Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Human Rights Reform in the Air
| Author: |
|---|
U.S. Ambassador Bolton is leading efforts to toughen guidelines for a new UN human rights body. (Photo: AP).
It has become a late-winter ritual. The United States releases its annual report card on human rights around the world every year at this time and then sends a delegation to Geneva to battle in the UN Human Rights Commission, where states it has severely criticized are in abundance. But this year the dynamic has changed. While the U.S. report drew familiar complaints from China and Cuba, it was also criticized by the prominent rights watchdog Amnesty International for hypocrisy. Coverage of the rights survey had to compete with reports on U.S. force-feeding of prisoners held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which UN officials are calling on Washington to close (CNN).
The United States has found itself alone in pushing for a more robust reform of the UN rights commission. On March 15, it cast one of the few dissenting votes (Reuters) in a 170-4 UN General Assembly vote creating a new Human Rights Council. The new council will have a higher status than the commission it will replace, and is to be a subsidiary body of the General Assembly. Meeting year-round as opposed to the six-week annual session of the commission, its members are to be elected by a majority of all 191 UN Members. Barry Lowenkron, the U.S. assistant secretary for democracy, human rights, and labor, told cfr.org, Washington was worried that it is still possible for the most egregious violators of human rights to gain membership in the council.
Although it voted against the proposal, Ambassador John Bolton said the United States would still cooperate with the council to make it as effective as possible. This might not be enough to satisfy the U.S. Congress, which has threatened to withhold UN funding if rights reforms did not go far enough (WashPost). A congressional subcommittee responsible for human rights issues is expected to discuss the matter March 16. Despite U.S. objections, top UN officials, Nobel peace laureates, and a number of democratic states have come out in favor of the new council as an improvement on the discredited commission, which is described in this CFR Background Q&A. Former President Jimmy Carter, speaking recently at CFR in New York, conceded the shortfalls of the reforms but blasted the Bush administration for subverting the process.
But Washington also has its supporters for pressing human rights issues. They include civil society activists in countries like China and Egypt as well as some highly regarded rights watchdog organizations. The group Freedom House, for example, has backed the U.S. push for a stronger UN rights council. The co-chairs of the U.S. Congressional Task Force on UN Reform, Newt Gingrich and George Mitchell, also found the proposed rights council inadequate. Among their concerns: that it would be tougher to remove human rights violators from the council (IHT) than to vote them on.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
