home > by publication type > backgrounder > Targets for Terrorism: Food and Agriculture
Email
| Author: | cfr.org editorial staff |
|---|
Updated: January 2006
No. The United States spends more than $1 billion every year to keep America’s food supply safe, but even without terrorism, food-borne diseases cause about 5,000 deaths and 325,000 hospitalizations each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson told a congressional terrorism panel in November 2001 that he was “particularly concerned” about food-related terrorism, which could involve either attempts to introduce poisons into the food supply or attacks that would ruin domestically cultivated crops or livestock.
Yes. In 1984, members of an Oregon religious commune—followers of an Indian-born guru named Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh—tried to influence a local election by poisoning salad bars with salmonella bacteria to sicken voters. Although no one died, 751 people became ill. There have been a couple of other attempts to deliberately contaminate food with biological agents since World War II, but these have been criminal acts, not terrorism.
There have been no documented terrorist attacks on U.S. agriculture. But the number and variety of food-borne illnesses and crop and livestock diseases make it hard to distinguish terrorist attacks from natural events. It took a year for U.S. officials to conclude that the Oregon attack was deliberate.
The Oregon attack took place at local restaurants, near the end of the food-distribution chain, but an attack could occur at any point between farm and table. Imported food could be tainted with biological or chemical agents before entering the United States, or toxins could be introduced at a domestic food-processing plant. Crops or livestock raised on American soil could also be targeted. Experts also worry that terrorists might try to spread false rumors about unsafe foods via the mass media or the Internet.
Some attacks could cause illnesses and deaths, depending upon how quickly the contamination was detected. But even attacks that don’t directly affect human health could cause panic, undermine the economy, and even erode confidence in the U.S. government, experts say. Agriculture exports amount to about $140 billion a year, and many American jobs have at least an indirect connection to food and agriculture. A 1970s plot by Palestinian terrorists to inject mercury into Jaffa oranges reduced Israel’s exports of citrus fruit to Europe by 40 percent, and a 1989 incident in which a shipment of Chilean grapes to the United States tested positive for cyanide led to international trade suspensions that cost Chile $200 million. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that an attack on livestock—a successful attempt to infect American cattle with a contagious disease such as foot-and-mouth, for example—could cause between $10 billion and $30 billion in damage to the U.S. economy.
We don’t know. Concerns about such attacks have grown since September 11. Some forms of attack wouldn’t require a large or highly skilled organization and could come from foreign groups like Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network, domestic terrorists, eco-terrorists, a cult-like group such as Oregon’s Rajneeshees, or an unaffiliated individual—anyone who wanted to undermine the economy and spread panic. Elsewhere, groups that have threatened agroterrorist attacks include Tamil militants in Sri Lanka and British activists opposed to chemical and biological warfare.
The two main agencies are the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), a part of the Department of Agriculture. The FSIS handles meat, poultry, and egg inspections, and the FDA inspects everything else. State and local agencies, other federal bodies, and foreign inspection services are also sometimes involved in food safety.
Many experts have long favored consolidating food-safety programs in a single agency, and calls for a consolidation have been repeated since September 11. But food manufacturers and some members of Congress have grown accustomed to the current system and oppose its overhaul.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
In The Closing of the American Border, Edward Alden goes behind the scenes to tell the story of the Bush administration’s struggle to balance security and openness in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
Complete list of CFR Books.
This report lays out a thoughtful agenda for U.S. policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo, arguing that what happens there should matter to the United States--for humanitarian reasons as well as economic and strategic ones.
In this report, CFR Senior Fellow Michael A. Levi analyzes the potential use of deterrence in preventing terrorist groups from acquiring nuclear weapons and recommends a new approach to U.S. declaratory policy, as well as ways to improve U.S. capabilities to determine the sources of terrorist attacks.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR.
Foreign Affairs has compiled a collection of articles that offer policy prescriptions to some of the world's most pressing problems.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1.212.434.9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the link below.
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Global Economy 