Home | Site Index | FAQs | Contact | RSS  | Podcast

• Related Materials

  • Department of Homeland Security
    By cfr.org editorial staff
    Backgrounder
    Updated: January 2006

  • Police Departments
    By cfr.org editorial staff
    Backgrounder
    Updated: January 2006

  • FBI and Law Enforcement
    By cfr.org editorial staff
    Backgrounder
    Updated: January 2006

  • Fire Departments
    By cfr.org editorial staff
    Backgrounder
    Updated: January 2006

  • Responding to Biological Attacks
    Backgrounder
    Updated: January 2006

  See Also

  Counterterrorism

  Academic Modules

  Academic Module: America the Vulnerable: How Our Government Is Failing to Protect Us from Terrorism

  Hot Topics from GlobalSecurity.org

  • Next Generation Bomber
    
  • Op. Iraqi Freedom: 5 Years
    
  • VH-71 Marine One Problems
    
  • KC-45 Tanker Boeing v. Airbus
    
  • F-117A Nighthawk
    

  More From:

  GlobalSecurity.org

  ISN Security Watch

  • The world's water future
    
  • ISN Podcasts: The Cyprus issue
    
  • Rattling imaginary sabres
    
  • ISN Podcasts: China, more friend than foe
    
  • East Timor: Hard rock, soft water
    

  More From:

  International Relations and Security Network

  Responding to a Terrorist Attack: Hospital Emergency Rooms

  Author:	cfr.org editorial staff

  Updated: January 2006

  • What role do hospital emergency rooms play in responding to terrorist attacks?
  • Could emergency rooms be overwhelmed by the casualties of a large terrorist attack?
  • Do hospitals have to meet federal standards of preparedness for terrorist attacks?
  • Are some emergency rooms better prepared than others to handle victims of a terrorist attack?

  ---

  What role do hospital emergency rooms play in responding to terrorist attacks?

  Emergency room teams treat those injured in conventional terrorist attacks—such as a car bomb—in much the same way they treat victims of car accidents. Emergency rooms would also be on the front lines after terrorist attacks involving weapons of mass destruction. After an attack with a biological weapon such as anthrax or smallpox, emergency room physicians and nurses would likely be the first to detect exposure, identify the agent used, and treat the victims. Most victims of chemical or radiation attacks would be decontaminated by firefighters and emergency medical services ( EMS ) workers at the scene and then be rushed to local emergency rooms. But U.S. emergency room teams don’t have much experience in handling large terrorist attacks and don’t always know what to expect.

  Could emergency rooms be overwhelmed by the casualties of a large terrorist attack?

  Perhaps. Hospitals could probably handle many types of smaller-scale attacks such as bus bombings, but experts say most U.S. emergency medical personnel aren’t properly trained or equipped to deal with a large number of victims of a chemical, biological, or radiation attack. Even a “Level-1” trauma center like Boston Medical Center, which is certified to treat the most serious injuries around the clock, can only decontaminate about twenty patients at a time.

  Moreover, after a biological, chemical, or radiation attack in a U.S. city, thousands of people—both actual victims and panicked bystanders—would flood local emergency rooms for testing, decontamination, and treatment. In the 1995 sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway system by the doomsday cult Aum Shinrikyo, about 4,000 people who were not affected by the gas rushed to nearby hospitals, overwhelming staff and facilities.

  To test hospital and emergency room capabilities, the Department of Homeland Security held the largest ever nationwide anti-terrorism drill in April 2005 to expose weak spots in the U.S.’s emergency response. Hospitals and law enforcement officials took part in the $16 million, five-day exercise, which involved simulated biological and chemical attacks, and required emergency responders to treat and assess mock patients.

  Do hospitals have to meet federal standards of preparedness for terrorist attacks?

  Not exactly. The federal government requires every U.S. hospital to have an “all-hazards plan”—a flexible set of procedures to follow in case of a disaster.  A recent study done by the Centers for Disease Control, found that 97 percent of hospitals have plans for natural disasters; about 85 percent have plans for responding the chemical and biological attacks and 77 percent have plans for responding to nuclear or radiological attacks and explosive incidents.

  In 2002, the Department of Health and Human Services created the National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program (NBHPP) to “prepare hospitals and supporting healthcare systems to deliver coordinated and effective care to victims of terrorism and other public health emergencies.” Since 2003, the program’s budget has been a nearly half a billion dollars, but the money has been slow to reach individual hospitals.

  Are some emergency rooms better prepared than others to handle victims of a terrorist attack?

  Yes. One of the best prepared is St. Vincent’s Medical Center in Manhattan, which treated victims of the 1993 and 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and has had a committee devoted to nuclear, biological, and chemical threats since 1997. (In fact, after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, doctors at St. Vincent ’s and other nearby trauma centers treated far fewer patients than they had anticipated because of the high percentage of fatalities.) Small-town facilities tend to be less prepared, with the odd exception: the only hospital emergency room in the country dedicated to treating patients for radiation exposure is located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee (population 26,700), near a major nuclear facility.

   

  Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.

• 

  New CFR Books

  

  In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.

  

  America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.

  

  In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.

  Complete list of CFR Books.

  

  

  New Independent Task Force Reports

  Confronting Climate Change

  This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.

  U.S.-Latin America Relations: A New Direction for a New Reality

  This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.

  About Independent Task Forces at the Council.

  

  

  New Council Special Reports

  Global FDI Policy

  After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.

  Dealing with Damascus

  In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.

  Complete list of Council Special Reports.

  

  

  Robert Mugabe's 1987 Article

  • “Struggle for Southern Africa:” In a 1987 Foreign Affairs article, then Prime Minister Robert Mugabe urged international intervention to protect southern Africa.

  

  

  

  Publications Information

  To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.

  For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.

  

  

  Permissions Requests

  To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.

  Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.

  You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.

  

  

•  

By Region  |  By Issue  |  By Publication Type  |  The Think Tank  |  For The Media  |  For Educators  |  About CFR

Home  |  Site Index  |  FAQ  |  Contact  |  RSS  |  Podcast

Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.