Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > backgrounders > Police Departments
| Author: | cfr.org editorial staff |
|---|
Updated: January 2006
Yes. While the core mission of police departments—responding to emergencies and ensuring public safety—remains the same, experts say the September 11 attacks triggered a shift in policing priorities around the country. Many police departments are devoting increased resources to preparing for terrorist attacks and gathering intelligence to head off possible threats. In the event of a terrorist attack, police officers would be among the first emergency workers on the scene: on September 11, thousands of New York City police officers rushed to the World Trade Center, and twenty-three were killed when the towers collapsed. Police departments are also often the first to respond to and investigate civilian reports of terrorism-related criminal activity.
Not really. Experts say that following attacks such as the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the 1995 bombing of Oklahoma City’s Murrah Federal Building, and the 1995 sarin gas attack in the Tokyo subway system, some big-city departments did begin to give more attention to security in certain buildings and transportation systems. For the most part, however, terrorism in the United States was considered a remote possibility, even in urban areas. Broader measures to prevent or prepare for an attack, such as improving intelligence sharing among law enforcement agencies or refining disaster plans, were generally not taken. Many local governments were facing budget deficits and focusing on trimming costs. Moreover, experts say that police departments generally thought the threat of terrorism could be handled by the FBI, the lead U.S. counterterrorism agency, and the CIA, the lead U.S. intelligence agency.
While their efforts vary according to their respective community’s resources and perceived vulnerability, many police departments have:
For the most part, the threat of terrorism has not led to large-scale hiring of new police officers. Counterterrorism measures put into place by the New York City Police Department (NYPD), which has firsthand experience in handling terrorist attacks and continues to respond to a flurry of threats, have made it a national and world model for police preparedness and training, as outlined in a comprehensive article published in the New Yorker in July 2005.
Its new measures include:
Primarily through Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which bring local and federal law enforcement officers together to respond to and investigate terrorism-related activity. The first JTTF was set up in 1979 with members of the NYPD and the FBI; the FBI established or authorized JTTFs in each of its fifty-six field offices.
No. Experts say the CIA, the FBI, and local law enforcement failed to communicate before the attacks—this was the major finding in the long-anticipated 9/11 Commission’s report. Many experts attribute the lack of cooperation to mistrust and cultural differences between the agencies. Also, investigations of the way New York’s police and fire departments coordinated their response on September 11 have revealed numerous breakdowns in communication and command systems that may have cost many lives.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
