home > by publication type > daily analysis > Israelis vote as plates shift beneath them
Email
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
Israelis prepare for elections (Photo: AP)
The election Israelis face (ElectionGuide.org) would have been unimaginable a few short months ago. The founding of a new centrist party, Kadima, late last year by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon drew mass defections and ended a generation of politics in Israel that pitted right-wing Likud against left-wing Labor. The election is previewed in this CFR Background Q&A by cfr.org's Esther Pan.
Gone, too, is Ariel Sharon himself. The blow he dealt to the political system was quickly followed by an even more devastating one: a stroke that left Israel's most forceful leader in a coma (WashPost), his career at an end. These events alone would have completely changed Israeli politics. Yet a third bolt from the blue—the victory of the terrorist group Hamas in Palestinian elections—looms even more ominously over the process.
What's an Israeli voter to do? According to polls (VOA), Israelis will likely give power to Sharon's new party, led now by acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, profiled here by the Washington Post. Olmert, dismissed by rivals as merely a caretaker, has successfully retained much of the surge of support Kadima drew when Sharon, frustrated with dogma in the traditional parties, founded the centrist group. However, as political analyst David Makovsky tells cfr.org's Bernard Gwertzman in an interview, "Olmert deserves a lot of credit for doing something that was unthinkable in Israeli politics. He turned Israeli politics on its head by putting forward a controversial policy initiative in the middle of an election campaign."
This has Olmert already thinking beyond the elections—demanding, for instance, that any aspiring Kadima coalition partners agree to fully support his plans for unilateral withdrawal from the West Bank (Haaretz). But this could be an overconfident move. Polls show Labor gaining as the election nears, and, as Britain's Independent notes, Kadima's poll numbers "reflect at once a weariness with continued conflict and the peace process, along with a recognition of the demographic argument that a Jewish state is incompatible with wholesale occupation of Palestinian territory."
Indeed, for all the freshness of Kadima, many are skeptical it will bring fresh ideas to the Middle East. Yoav Peled, a political scientist at Tel Aviv University, sees Olmert as far less likely to carry through dramatic plans than Sharon. "Before the Gaza disengagement, Sharon had to replace the heads of all three services, the Israel Defense Forces, Mossad, and the General Security Service (Shabak), in order to make them cooperate with his plans," Peled writes in an analysis for the dovish Middle East Report. "These institutions have a vested interest in the occupation and have consistently opposed any withdrawal." Likud, meanwhile, is resigning itself to opposition. Led by Sharon rival and Labor nemesis Binyamin Netanyahu, the party is polling poorly (BBC).
Egypt's Al Ahram, a good example of moderate Arab sentiment, dismisses the idea that anything has changed. "There is no big idea for the Israeli elections on 28 March," says the state-run paper. "There is a continuation of existing government policy. It's called separation and carries Sharon's imprimatur."
With Hamas asserting its right to ignore previous peace agreements, no one in Israel is pushing for new peace talks. And according to Rashid Khalidi, an expert in Palestinian politics, neither are average Palestinians. He tells cfr.org's Bernard Gwertzman that Palestinians who voted for Hamas in January's elections were frustrated with the long-ruling Fatah Party, which in their eyes failed in their negotiations with Israel and "ended up getting the Palestinians a terrible deal." Even those Palestinians who may not subscribe to Hamas' platform may "want a much tougher negotiating stance vis-à-vis Israel," he says. As the Economist put it, Israel's new consensus on the future has gone from "land for peace" to "shutting itself in, hoping for the best."
Haaretz election coverage | Washington Institute election resources
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.