home > by publication type > backgrounders > Israel Election Preview
Email
| Author: | Esther Pan |
|---|
March 24, 2006
Israelis hold parliamentary elections March 28 against a backdrop of two major events - the departure of Ariel Sharon from the political scene and the stunning electoral win of Hamas in Palestinian Authority elections in January. All indications point to a victory for Kadima, the centrist party formed by Sharon before his incapacitating stroke, and a subsequent governing coalition with the leftist Labor Party. Kadima leader Ehud Olmert then faces the challenge of navigating the coalition through a planned unilateral withdrawal from parts of the West Bank, opposed by right-wing parties, settlers, and the military. His ability to engage the Hamas-led government in peace talks remains uncertain.
The centrist Kadima Party, founded by Ariel Sharon and now headed by acting Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, is widely expected to win the most seats in the Israeli Knesset (parliament) in the March 28 elections. Kadima has consistently topped polls and is well ahead of its two major competitors, the leftist Labor Party and the right-wing Likud. None of the three parties is expected to gain enough votes for an outright majority in the Knesset. A Kadima victory would likely lead to a coalition government with the Labor Party, headed by Amir Peretz, and several smaller parties. Olmert has warned, however, that any potential coalition partners would have to support his plans for unilateral withdrawal from parts of the West Bank. As a result, "these elections are regarded as a referendum on whether Israel is going to stay in the West Bank," says Philip Wilcox Jr., a former U.S. consul-general in Jerusalem and president of the Foundation for Middle East Peace. Wilcox warns it's too early to take a Kadima victory for granted. "Israeli elections are always unpredictable, and pre-election polls are often not reflected in the results," he says. Some eighteen to twenty-five of the 120 Knesset seats are currently up for grabs by undecided voters.
By proportional representation, not direct election. Voters cast their ballot for a party list rather than individual candidates. The number of votes received by the party determines how many of its members gain Knesset seats. A party—or group of parties —needs sixty-one seats to have a majority coalition. The leader of the largest party in the coalition is awarded the prime minister's post. Israel's fractious political culture has resulted in a history of coalition governments. Sharon's controversial decision to unilaterally withdraw Israeli settlers from the Gaza Strip last August broke the coalition government of his former party, Likud, and led him to form Kadima and call for early elections.
Around 65 percent, Wilcox says, which is low by Israeli standards. Experts say these elections, lacking the towering and controversial figure of Sharon, are not captivating the public's attention. "There's a mood of apathy," Wilcox says. "[Amir] Peretz is a newcomer, and his policies focusing on economic welfare are not very popular. Olmert is not particularly likeable." And other experts say the public is disillusioned with Likud Party leader Binyamin Netanyahu, who accomplished little in his previous stint as prime minister from 1996-99, and who pushed through tough austerity measures as finance minister in Sharon's recent government. Many experts say Israelis are tired both of violence and the illusory promises of the peace process, and now favor unilateral action to set Israel's borders. "Israelis want to wash their hands of the Palestinians," says Steven Cook, a Middle East expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. "They're willing to make sacrifices for peace, but they don't believe they have a partner." Wilcox agrees. "I think most Israelis would like the Palestinians to go away and stay on their side of the wall," he says.
The public reaction also reflects a generational shift in Israeli politics, where a younger cohort of leaders—like Olmert—is seen as colorless bureaucrats who haven't yet proven themselves. The "founding fathers" of Israel, military men-turned-statesmen like Yitzak Rabin and Ariel Sharon who fought Israel's wars and set its policies for the half-century since its founding, are now mostly gone. Only Shimon Peres, the 82-year-old Labor stalwart, remains active in politics. He has joined the Kadima coalition.
Several minority groups hold considerable power in Israel's tiny voter pool of five million, according to David Makovsky of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. They include:
Experts say the surprise January victory of the militant Islamic group Hamas to lead the Palestinian Authority made Israelis even more wary of Palestinians. "For most Israelis, the election of Hamas cements the view that there is no Palestinian partner [for peace]," Wilcox says. Makovsky writes in a briefing paper that the Hamas win has reinforced the Israeli view that the country must act unilaterally. However, Hamas' win did not push the Israeli electorate to the right, as some observers had predicted. Voters tired of both Labor and Likud are supporting Kadima as a newly pragmatic option, Wilcox says. Israelis are increasingly coming to believe that Olmert's plan for withdrawal is necessary "so Israel can become the normal, peaceful state dreamed of by its founders," he says.
But that view will likely hold only as long as Hamas continues its ceasefire with Israel, now in its thirteenth month. Experts say it's in Hamas' interest to keep the peace as long as possible. "Terrorism would be offensive to the Palestinian public, which is exhausted and does not want to return to violence," Wilcox says. And while Hamas has been unwilling to recognize Israel or renounce violence, it will also try to prevent provoking the Israeli army. "[Hamas leaders] are not going to alter their world view, but they're also pragmatic," Cook says. "They don't want to give Israel an excuse to crack down on them."
It has removed the most charismatic candidate, and left a vacuum nearly impossible to fill, experts say. "No one else has Sharon's experience, cunning, or stature," Wilcox says. "He was a towering figure, whatever you thought of his policies. Olmert won't be nearly as strong as Sharon was, and will have to do more diplomacy and internal politicking to build and maintain a coalition." However, Kadima is showing it is more than a personality cult, as some believed. Sharon's incapacitation has given Olmert a chance to step out of his mentor's shadow and push his own agenda while claiming to continue Sharon's legacy.
It depends, experts say, on the type of coalition that results, the level of the party's public support, and what happens with the Palestinians. "Israel has a long history of centrist parties that make a big splash, and then fade out over time," Cook says. Olmert and Hamas have given each other some breathing room for now, but it remains to be seen how long that will last, he says. Olmert currently enjoys strong public support for his withdrawal plan. "Olmert's policy reflects the desires of the Israeli public, which understands that the whole settlement adventure has come at a huge cost," Wilcox says. But Olmert will face tremendous internal opposition to his plan from right-wing parties, settlers, and the military. In addition, the plan's unilateral nature limits its prospects with Palestinians, and a resumption of violence could derail it entirely, experts say.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.