Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > U.S. Energy Insecurity
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Soaring gas prices shocked U.S. consumers after Hurricane Katrina (Photo: AP)
Oil prices are moving again toward historic highs amid grim news out of petroleum-rich regions from the Niger Delta to the Persian Gulf. Americans have heard all this before, but there are signs of deepening unease about the United States' dependence on oil from shaky or despotic places. A new Public Agenda Confidence in Foreign Policy Index shows that more than half of the Americans surveyed are very worried about problems abroad disrupting oil supplies. Only the war in Iraq was of comparable concern to those interviewed. The survey was made prior to President Bush's much-noted "addiction to oil" warning in his January State of the Union speech and his call for new measures to end U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil by increasing funding for clean-energy research.
The administration issued a new set of corporate average fuel economy standards for light trucks on March 29 that Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta called the most ambitious ever. But critics have said the plan is too modest and have faulted the administration for failing to see the urgent national security aspects of its energy policy. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Richard Lugar (R-IN), pointing to a decline in U.S. influence around the world, says energy is "the albatross of U.S. national security." Lugar introduced legislation last month calling for U.S. energy partnerships with China and India to reduce the potential for conflict with two of the world's fastest growing economies and energy users. Energy expert Daniel Yergin, writing recently in Foreign Affairs, says there is also a need for cooperation on protecting the world's immense energy infrastructure. In the United States alone, he writes, there are more than 160,000 miles of oil pipelines. The country's increased reliance on liquefied natural gas raises a new set of security concerns, as explained in this CFR Background Q&A.
A number of experts have urged a shift in U.S. climate change policy in tandem with a new energy plan. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL), in an April 3 speech, criticized the administration's failure to go beyond encouraging voluntary efforts by industry to curb emissions of fossil fuels. Obama said the government should use tax breaks and loan guarantees to stimulate greater use of environmentally friendly energy sources. A 2004 CFR policy initiative, written by Adjunct Senior Fellow David Victor, offers several options the government could pursue, including the creation of a global system of emissions trading that would build markets for low-emission technologies. Such a system would succeed the Kyoto Protocol, which Washington refuses to sign because of the economic burdens it would impose in the United States, the world's largest producer of so-called greenhouse gases.
The issue is resonating in Congress, where the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is holding a climate change conference April 4, in which twenty-nine experts will testify on whether a mandatory climate change plan is needed. In the hopes of remaining competitive internationally, a small segment of U.S. industry has already committed to an emissions-trading plan, by joining the Chicago Climate Exchange. State governments have begun to initiate their own standards on emissions: The American Council for Energy Efficient Economy says ten states since 2004 have also established energy-saving standards for up to thirty products, and Congress has made some of those standards federal law.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
