Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Safeguarding Nuclear Energy
| Prepared by: | Eben Kaplan |
|---|
A guard post outside the Three Mile Island nuclear plant. (Photo: AP)
Nuclear energy is environmentally friendly and relatively cheap to produce—or so say a growing number of environmentalists who have made common cause with industry as global warming has moved to the top of the green agenda. Already responsible for some 20 percent of the electricity in the United States, nuclear power figures prominently in President Bush's new Advanced Energy Initiative (PDF). But is it safe? The Three Mile Island and Chernobyl accidents are disturbing reminders of the dangers of nuclear power. In a post-9/11 security environment terrorism is an even graver threat: The 9/11 Commission report suggested senior al-Qaeda figures Mohammed Atta and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had both expressed an interest in targeting nuclear plants. A 2004 report by the Union of Concerned Scientists suggests a successful attack on the Indian Point plant, thirty-five miles from Manhattan, could kill as many as 44,000 in the near-term. A new CFR Background Q&A examines anti-terrorism measures at U.S. nuclear plants.
Just this month, officials at Florida's Turkey Point reactor had a scare when they discovered a small hole drilled into a cooling pipe (Miami Herald). It is unclear whether the hole was the result of an honest mistake or an act of sabotage, though it has caused some to question whether security at nuclear plants is sufficient (CSMonitor).
At an April 4 hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Government Reform, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) submitted a report suggesting the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the group responsible for overseeing U.S. nuclear plants, needs to strengthen its regulations.
Though the GAO did not, other groups have criticized the NRC for not requiring nuclear plants to prepare for a 9/11-style airplane attack. A 2002 Electric Power Research Institute study concluded plants are sufficiently sturdy (PDF) to withstand such an attack, though the report was commissioned by the nuclear industry and its credibility has been widely questioned. The nuclear watchdog group Committee to Bridge the Gap is advocating that nuclear facilities be outfitted with giant steel cages to lessen the impact of an airplane.
Another concern is the security of spent fuel rods. A breech in the pool where the used fuel is cooled could result in a fire and the release of high levels of radiation. A July 2005 CFR meeting considered the dangers posed by spent fuel, and the National Academies performed an in-depth study on the subject. A Congressional Research Service report provides a good overview of nuclear plant security (PDF).
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
