home > by publication type > daily analysis > America’s Sagging Brand
Email
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
American icons are increasingly shrugged off abroad. (Photo: AP)
Though Americans diverge on many aspects of foreign policy, they generally agree about the need to improve their nation's declining image abroad, which is charted by the Pew Global Attitudes Project. To combat the slide, the Bush administration began spending more on public diplomacy immediately after 9/11. Last year, President Bush appointed a former aide and confidante, Karen Hughes, as a kind of ambassador-at-large to explain American policy aims to the world. Hughes spoke on the challenges facing the U.S. public diplomacy effort at CFR's New York headquarters on Wednesday. A transcript of her remarks is available here.
Funding government-wide has increased yearly since, according to the Congressional Research Service; the latest rise from $954 million in FY 2005 to just over $1 billion this year. Arguing on behalf of another increase, to $1.14 billion for FY 2007, Hughes told a House panel on May 3 "the values we promote are universal, meant for people everywhere, and we seek to promote them with other nations and peoples in a spirit of partnership and respect."
But the government's efforts are beset by problems. Testifying the same day as Hughes, the Government Accountability Office's lead auditor on public diplomacy efforts reported the U.S. public diplomacy campaign still lacked strategic coherence. Disturbingly, "30 percent of officers in language-designated public diplomacy positions in the Muslim world have not attained the level of language proficiency required for their positions, hampering their ability to engage with foreign publics," he said.
Nor is needle of global opinion moving significantly. Confirming years of negative poll results, Andrew Kohut, who runs Pew's surveys, concludes in his recent book that "America's image is at a low ebb: where once it was considered the champion of democracy, America is now seen as a self-absorbed, militant hyperpower." (In an interesting corollary, Pew last November found more Americans harboring isolationist attitudes due to the war in Iraq and other issues.)
CFR Fellow Julia Sweig blames much of this backlash on the Bush administration's unilateralism. Sweig, who talks about her new book, Friendly Fire, in this cfr.org Podcast, is a Latin America expert who sees parallels between Washington's poor reputation in its immediate neighborhood and the recent spike in anti-Americanism in the rest of the world. In effect, she says, America's dismissive attitude toward its own hemisphere has gone global, with predictable results.
Others believe Washington makes too much of its own role in all this. Marc Lynch, author of Voices of the New Arab Public, says this is not a war of ideas between the United States and Islam, but rather an inter-Arab issue. "In fact, America is a relatively marginal and often self-defeating player in the real ideological struggle among Arabs and Muslims," Lynch writes in the National Interest. "American power and policies matter, but direct American interventions, however necessary, tend to reinforce al-Qaeda's arguments about an Islam under siege."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.