Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Lebanon’s Power Politics
| Author: | Lee Hudson Teslik |
|---|
Pro-Syrian factions are drumming up support in Lebanon. (Photo: AP)
Protests in Beirut this week underscored lingering frustration with Lebanon's ruling elite one year after the so-called Cedar Revolution ousted a pro-Syrian prime minister and brought a nationalist coalition to power. News reports said 250,000 Lebanese protested (UPI) a government plan to revise the contracts of civil servants. The protests, backed by some pro-Syria groups, were seen as a "show of force" by Damascus (FT), which seems to have stymied efforts by Lebanon's parliament to remove the country's pro-Syrian president, Emile Lahoud. The parliamentary coalition argues that a three-year extension of Lahoud's term, in 2004, was unconstitutional. But a resurgence by Syria's allies, including the fundamentalist group Hezbollah, has weakened Lebanon's parliament, and Michel Aoun, a prominent secular Christian leader who broke away from the coalition, has called for the government's overthrow.
Experts say discontent has festered over Lebanon's corrupt and inefficient power structure, which the Cedar Revolution reshuffling didn't effectively resolve. Karim Makdisi, a professor at the American University of Beirut, says in an interview with cfr.org's Esther Pan that "there's no system for resolving disputes in this country." Lebanon's government works under a "confessional" system, set up in 1943 by withdrawing French authorities, in which power is divided among religious groups, supposedly based on population proportion. But Lebanon hasn't conducted a census since 1932, and according to a 2005 EU report (PDF), the system is in need of urgent reform. In accordance with the 1989 Taif Accords, seats in Lebanon's parliament are divided evenly between Christians and Muslims. There is no official data, but experts say Muslims now represent at least 60 percent of Lebanon's population.
Syria's role remains unclear. In February 2005 there was political upheaval in Beirut when Syrian officials were implicated in the assassination of the Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, and Syrian troops were forced to withdraw from the country, where they had been stationed since 1976. Syria has accused Lebanese parliamentarians of working with U.S. officials (LAT) to undermine Syria's government, though Lebanon's foreign minister dismissed these allegations (Daily Star). Now accusations are flying the other way, with Lebanese nationalists saying Syria is inciting protests to weaken parliament's mandate and keep Lahoud in power.
Syria is just one of two borders on which Lebanon has problems. Ever looming is "the Israel question"—and with it the presence of Hezbollah, the Shiite group most famous for bombing the American embassy in Beirut in 1983. Hezbollah continues to launch attacks against Israelis in the disputed Shebaa Farms border area in the Golan Heights region (BBC). Lebanon claims rights to the territory, though the United Nations considers it Syrian land under Israeli occupation. The United States has denounced Hezbollah, and designates it a terrorist group. But the group has gained political legitimacy in Lebanon, holding twenty-three seats in parliament, and has made progress toward disarmament under political pressure from other domestic factions. The fine line between terrorism and political legitimacy is examined in this recent CFR Background Q&A, with reference made to Hezbollah's evolving role in Lebanese politics.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
