home > by publication type > daily analysis > The Politics of the 'World's Game'
Email
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad practices his moves. (Photo: AP)
"Football, it seemed to me, is not really played for the pleasure of kicking a ball about, but is a species of fighting."
—George Orwell
Much is made every four years about the deeper significance of the World Cup as soccer's international tournament, which begins in venues across Germany a week from Friday. America has its World Series, fought primarily by U.S. and Dominican players, with some highly-paid mercenaries from Japan, South Korea, Venezuela, and Panama, plus a handful of Cuban defectors (Baseball Almanac). But the "world's game" is soccer, or "football" as it is known in most places outside the United States. In many ways, over the next month, attention around the globe will focus on little else.
It may be inevitable, then, that politics has sullied the run up to the event. In Germany, the host nation, this year's tournament and the legion of foreign spectators expected to arrive for the matches provide the latest excuse for self-examination (some say self-flagellation) on the question of the nation's racist past. German papers were filled with recriminations after a former government spokesman warned publicly that some areas of the country—mostly in the depressed East, where neo-Nazi skinheads are active—might turn out to be lethal for dark-skinned visitors (WashPost). 'So is Germany Racist or Not?' asks Spiegel Online, the website of the nation's authoritative weekly. Britain's Football Association, meanwhile, launched an ad campaign urging fans of England's squad who cross the channel to attend Cup matches "not to mention the war." (NYT).
The debate made news around the world, including in Iran (IRNA), which has seen its own World Cup bid turn into an, uh, political football. Some politicians in Britain and the United States wanted Iran banned as a way of pressuring it to cooperate on nuclear matters. Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel opposed the idea and it made no headway at soccer's world governing body, FIFA. But in the United States in particular, the idea of an Iran ban sparked a spirited debate between those opposed on the left (Nation) and those on the right (Weekly Standard) who believe it would be a uniquely effective means of making Iranians realize how serious Washington is about preventing nuclear proliferation.
For most of the world, though, politics is just so much crowd noise. In FIFA's Asia region, where the game is growing most quickly, Japan, Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Iran vie for regional sympathy. Several small nations, meanwhile, hope the World Cup will allow them to make the kind of global impression that would be impossible in, say, the UN General Assembly. Ghana is one of these potential "Cinderella" nations, according to the BBC. So, too, is Trindad and Tobago, the smallest of the finalist nations. "All the Caribbean islands are supporting us," said Harvey Borras, Trinidad's consul in Miami. "I'm hoping people worldwide will get to know more about our country" (Miami Herald).
Daniel Drezner, a well-known blogger and University of Chicago political scientist, says all of this loses sight of the fact that soccer is just a game. He sees little substance behind the stories linking soccer to, for instance, the salvation of strife-torn Ivory Coast (National Geographic). Then again, the world might respond, 'What do you expect from an American?' As Sports Illustrated columnist Adam Hofstetter complains,"Americans as a whole just don't care about the World Cup."
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.