Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > op-eds > Bush's Attitude Adjustment
| Author: | Michael Moran, Executive Editor, CFR.org |
|---|
June 11, 2006
Star-Ledger
For more than three years now, America ’s reputation in the world has been in free-fall. The Bush administration’s war on terror, coupled with the war in Iraq , has angered allies and hardened the hatred of old foes. Now, though, it seems President Bush has begun to face publicly the issues most responsible for this collapse.
The signs were subtle at first. Then came Bush’s televised news conference with Britain’s Prime Minister Tony Blair late last month.
“Saying ‘Bring it on—kind of tough talk, you know—that sent the wrong signal to people,” Bush said contritely that day. “I learned some lessons about expressing my self maybe in a little more sophisticated manner—you know, ‘wanted dead or alive,’ that kind of talk. I think in certain parts of the world it was misinterpreted, and so I learned from that. And I think the biggest mistake that’s happened so far, at least from our country’s involvement in Iraq, is Abu Ghraib. We’ve been paying for that for a long period of time.”
Bush’s shift in tone was also evident on Thursday, when he reacted to the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the al Qaeda leader in Iraq, with caution rather than flippant optimism. “We can expect the terrorists and insurgents to carry on without him,” the president said.
This is a startling turn of events. For years, the administration has treated negative impressions of U.S.foreign policy as a public relations issue. Now, in the past month, the administration appears to have comprehended the depth of the problem. In the words of Karen Hughes, a longtime Bush adviser who is now, in effect, assistant secretary of state for making-nice-to-the-world, “policy must match public diplomacy.”
In Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President, experts from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution propose a new, nonpartisan Middle East strategy drawing on the lessons of past failures to address both the short-term and long-term challenges to U.S. interests.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
