Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > America's Foil in Central Asia
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
A worker prepares a globe for the 2006 SCO Summit in Pudong, Shanghai. (Photo: AP)
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has begun its annual summit amid growing questions about its role as a regional hedge against U.S. influence. Though multilateral organizations have enjoyed scant success among the post-Soviet states of Central Asia, the SCO is an exception, as explained in this new Backgrounder. The group's burgeoning influence in the region was highlighted by the presence of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who said his country's inclusion in the group could "prevent the threats of domineering powers and their aggressive interference in global affairs" (Guardian). Chinese President Hu Jintao and Russian President Vladimir Putin did not mention Iran in their opening summit addresses, but they are both scheduled to meet with Ahmadinejad in the next two days (Reuters).
Formed at China's behest five years ago, the SCO began as a sleepy club of six states—China, Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan—whose mandate involved little more than resolving Beijing's outstanding border disputes and improving trade, energy, and development ties in the region. Four years later, the SCO paved the way for the U.S. military's ejection from its base in Uzbekistan, outlined in this Backgrounder. Iran—one of four observer states along with India, Pakistan, and Mongolia—is clamoring to become a full-fledged member (Zaman).
Indeed, the SCO has emerged as a powerful force in an increasingly important region. Its mandate has evolved to include counterterrorism, joint military exercises, and efforts to curb drug smuggling (RFE/RL). Between its member and observer states, the SCO holds a large chunk of the world's natural gas supplies and nuclear ammunition. Some analysts even suggest the group has the potential to become an Eastern version of NATO, a conjecture the SCO's executive general has sought to dispel (RIA Novosti).
While the policy orientations of the group's members may overlap on a number of issues—chief among them their suspicion of U.S. designs on the region—yawning gaps remain between the regional outlooks of the SCO's two flagship members: Russia and China. Neither has indicated any interest in allowing Iran to become a full-fledged member anytime soon. Nor would either of these states want to see the SCO act as a check to their own ambitions in a region both consider their 'near abroad' (AsiaTimes).
The future shape and composition of the Shanghai group, what the Guardian's Simon Tisdale calls a "dictators' club," should have enormous impact on U.S. economic, military, and geopolitical interests in Central Asia. Martha Brill Olcott of the Carnegie Endowment breaks down these interests, while RFE/RL's Daniel Kimmage looks at the orientation of the SCO after last summer’s newsworthy summit.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
