Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > India Blasts Threaten Peace
| Prepared by: | Esther Pan |
|---|
The train bombings could damage Indo-Pakistani relations. (AP)
Shaken by its deadliest terrorist attack in more than a decade, India has begun a sweep for suspects. Suspicion has fallen on a Pakistan-based group that has fought for Kashmiri separatism, raising concerns the incident could threaten the fragile peace process between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan (CSMonitor).
On July 11, a series of coordinated bombings hit the train system of India's financial capital, Mumbai, killing more than 200 (LAT). India detained more than 350 people for questioning and then named two suspects (AP). The Indian intelligence agency is also investigating reports of an al-Qaeda link to the attack (NYT). Governments around the world, including that of Pakistan, condemned the attack. The Guardian summed up world opinion, saying "the indiscriminate mass murder of innocent people is terrorism, pure and simple. It can never be justified."
Indian security officials almost immediately focused suspicions on Lashkar-e Taiba, one of many Islamic rebel groups fighting Indian security forces in Kashmir. The group has been blamed by police for a number of past attacks on Indian soil, including nearly a dozen attacks in Mumbai since 1997. Seen as the most sophisticated of the militant organizations fighting to wrest Kashmir from India, Lashkar-e Taiba has been accused of receiving operational and financial support from Pakistan.
Kashmir—the mountainous region between the two nations—has been disputed since India and Pakistan were partitioned by Britain in 1947, and has caused two of the three Indian-Pakistani wars. The dispute over the region brought the two countries to the brink of another war in 2002. In The Hindu, Praveen Swami writes that the train bombings are part of a war between Kashmir separatists and India that has no visible end. While the Kashmir issue is unlikely to derail India's economic and political rise, its potential to spark a nuclear war between India and Pakistan demands that the conflict be resolved, writes India expert Sumit Ganguly in Foreign Affairs.
The relationship between India and Pakistan had been warming after decades of mutual suspicion. Peace talks between the two nations began in 2004 and were due to resume this month. But The Hindu and other Indian papers are now calling for Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to exert more pressure on Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to stop his country's support for terror groups that attack India. Singh has repeatedly said Pakistan must honor its agreement not to let its territory be used for terrorist attacks against India. But Pakistani officials heatedly denied any involvement in the train attacks (VOA).
The Times of India said the attacks must not be allowed to stoke violence between Hindus and Muslims, as has happened in the past.
The stakes could hardly be higher between the two countries. The Natural Resources Defense Council offers a sobering look at what a potential nuclear conflict between the two states would look like. And the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists profiles the nuclear arsenals of India and Pakistan.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
Start-Up Nation addresses the trillion-dollar question: How is it that Israel—a country of 7.1 million, only sixty years old, surrounded by enemies— produces more start-up companies than large, peaceful, and stable nations like Japan, China, India, Korea, Canada, and the UK? With the insights of geopolitical experts and investors, the authors examine this nation’s adversity-driven culture to answer this question and offer prescriptions for a global economy on the rebound.
In Forces of Fortune, Vali Nasr presents a paradigm-changing revelation that will transform the understanding of the Muslim world at large. He reveals that there is a vital but unseen rising force in the Islamic world—a new business-minded middle class—that is building a vibrant new Muslim world economy and that holds the key to winning the cold war against Iran and extremists.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba's unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
Complete list of CFR Books
The report of this bipartisan Task Force of distinguished leaders and experts represents a strong consensus on the importance of repairing America's immigration policy. It makes the case that maintaining America's political and economic leadership depends on attracting talented and hard-working immigrants, and on securing the country's borders in a smart, effective, and humane way.
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
Identifying international threats and acting on them may be the most difficult job for U.S. policymakers. This report
provides an actionable road map for managing international threats before they erupt into crises and makes a strong case that preventive action is not a luxury but a necessity.
For more than a decade, the United States has mostly watched from the sidelines as Asian countries organize themselves into an alphabet soup of new multilateral groups. In this report, the authors review the relationship between pan-Asian and trans-Pacific institutions and suggest policy guidelines for a new U.S. approach to this new Asian landscape.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
