Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Israelis, Rice Consider Peacekeeping Force
| Prepared by: | CFR.org Staff |
|---|
Iranian women hold posters of Nasrallah in Tehran. (AP/Vahid Salemi)
As Lebanon suffers under continuing rounds of Israeli air strikes and the United Nations, Europe, and other international players demand Israel curb its attacks (BBC), the violence cast a new light on the role played by Iran and Syria. Israel's defense minister says the country will consider deploying an international force (LAT) on the southern Lebanese border, and a new U.S. diplomatic initiative in the region (NYT), spearheaded by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, reportedly aims to convince Syria's Arab allies to urge Damascus to reexamine the long-term implications of the aid it provides for Iran's stalking horse, Hezbollah (AP). Several Arab states already have expressed concern about the new power of Shiism in the region, from Iraq's new government to Hezbollah to Iran itself. Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak reiterated his anger at Iranian involvement (Ynet) in stirring the separate Hamas-Israeli violence in Gaza. CFR President Richard N. Haass says the Middle East is entering a new era in which "external powers count for less, and local actors—be they states or militias or individuals—count for more" (NYT).
In fact, Bill Samii of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty writes that Tehran and Damascus have been involved in this crisis from its outset. The two countries, whose relationship is examined in this Backgrounder, are exploiting the crisis to try to increase their regional influence. Don Darling notes in the Weekly Standard that Hezbollah's recent use of the Iranian-produced Raad-1 missile threatens 2 million Israelis, and leaves no doubt about Tehran's involvement in the violence. Iran's backing transformed Hezbollah from a ragtag group of fighters into a formidable military movement, writes Georgetown University professor Daniel Byman in his authoritative book, Deadly Connections: States That Sponsor Terrorism. Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah is given credit for skillfully maneuvering the group into the Lebanese government.
In Damascus, Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad has faced multiple challenges since taking over the presidency after his father's death in 2000. The Los Angeles Times says the Lebanon crisis reflects Syria's desire to increase its political clout by emulating Iran's model for greater independence through defiance of the international community. Syria's decline in influence after the assassination of Rafik Hariri in February 2005 is explained in this Backgrounder. Flynt Leverett, senior fellow at the New American Foundation, illuminates Bashar's regime in his book, Inheriting Syria.
And Iran is having internal power struggles of its own. Pepe Escobar writes in the Asia Times that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad leads one of four factions vying for power in Tehran, and he is following his own agenda, which may not necessarily be that of the country's theocratic leadership.
Other Arab countries are expressing sympathy for the Lebanese civilians sustaining most of the casualties, and a measure of anger at Hezbollah (WashPost). But this sentiment is not reflected in public opinion on the Arab street: Most regular citizens in a range of Arab countries support Hezbollah's actions (CSMonitor). The Middle East Media Research Institute details the disparate reactions in Lebanon, Iran, and Syria to Israel's military offensive, finding both praise and some criticism. Syrian political expert Sami Moubayed writes that some in the Middle East are quietly wondering if Nasrallah is another Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser, who led his country to "unforgivable defeat" in 1967.
And the crisis reflects badly on the United States, which many in Lebanon see as having abandoned the country after encouraging it to choose democracy and push out Syria. By failing to rein in Israel's military campaign against Lebanon, the United States is damaging its own interests and reputation in the region and making Israel more insecure, writes Muqtedar Khan of the Brookings Institution.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
