Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Impasse on Immigration
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Farm workers pick strawberries at a field in California. (AP/Sandy Huffaker)
The year began with immigration at the forefront of national debate. But as Congress prepares for its summer recess, the issue has been relegated to town hearings where debate has degenerated into partisan and bicameral disputes. Anyone wondering whether field hearings (AP) scheduled by House Republicans would spur compromise was set straight by the title of the first session: "Should We Embrace the Senate's Grant of Amnesty to Millions of Illegal Aliens and Repeat the Mistakes of the Immigration and Control Act of 1986?" House GOP officials see electoral gains in sticking with their bill stressing tough enforcement measures (The Hill), and they are also buoyed by moves in at least thirty states this year to crack down on illegal immigration (USA Today). House Republicans have scheduled three committee meetings this week dealing with border security and immigration.
Lawmakers from both parties agree immigration reform is urgent to deal with the estimated twelve million illegal immigrants in the country and concerns that the porous U.S.-Mexican border can be exploited by terrorists. But the proposed Senate measure, which enjoys bipartisan support, would provide a path to citizenship for most illegal immigrants in the country. The House bill, meanwhile, seeks the ultimate return of illegal immigrants and extensive border security measures. Rep. Thomas Tancredo (R-CO), a leading exponent of the House bill, tells CFR.org enforcement of U.S. immigration laws is ultimately essential to preserving U.S. national identity. The Bush administration, which supports the comprehensive reform approach of the Senate, has already moved to toughen border controls (WashTimes). This Backgrounder explores the alternative approaches to immigration reform.
Even a unified Congress would have trouble solving the illegal immigration issue. A recent debate between Tamar Jacoby of the Manhattan Institute and Stephen Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies highlighted some of the disagreements about the overall impact of immigration. Another Manhattan Institute senior fellow, Steven Malanga, writes in City Journal that legal and illegal immigrants currently flowing into the United States tend to be less skilled and educated than past immigrants, posing longer-term challenges to the economy. The Wall Street Journal's John Fund endorses a "rational" guest-worker program, saying an enforcement-only approach is doomed to the same failure as the decades-long "war on drugs."
CFR senior fellow Jagdish N. Bhagwati says there is no alternative to accommodating the current pool of illegal immigrants, but new legislation should focus on helping them integrate better through programs such as teaching English. The cost, he says, should be shared by Mexico. But Mexico itself represents another complication in the immigration reform debate. The country's recent presidential poll remains unresolved. Whoever emerges victorious faces a weakened capacity to push through reforms that could ease immigration pressures, writes CFR senior fellow Julia E. Sweig in a new Washingtonpost.com "Think Tank Town" dispatch. A recent CFR special report on Mexico suggests that Washington reach out to Mexico's new president as a partner and offer assistance in areas such as police training. The report says Mexico, which receives almost all of its nearly $25 billion in annual migrant remittances from the United States, should reciprocate U.S. offers by seriously cooperating on immigration.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
