home > by publication type > daily analysis > NATO's New Afghan Challenge
Email
| Prepared by: | CFR.org Staff |
|---|
Afghan soldiers stand shoulder-to-shoulder with NATO troops. (NATO/Flona Stapley)
The U.S. military has handed over military duties in Afghanistan's unruly southern provinces to NATO, whose forces had previously been deployed only to relatively peaceful regions in the north and around the capital, Kabul. The gravity of the handover became immediately apparent, with four NATO soldiers killed and a number wounded in a series of attacks by Taliban fighters soon after the alliance assumed responsibility for security in the south (AP). Still, the increase in NATO troop strength will allow the U.S. military to shift more of its forces to the violence-plagued Afghan-Pakistani border region, as this new Backgrounder explains.
There are two military command structures in Afghanistan: the 22,000-member U.S.-led coalition, and NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), consisting of roughly 18,000 troops. The coalition mission, outlined in this Backgrounder, comes as the Taliban has stepped up its activity in the region, killing hundreds of Afghans in shootings, suicide attacks, and roadside bombings. Taliban fighters are growing bolder, often mimicking the headline-grabbing tactics of insurgents in Iraq, and moving into smaller towns in southern Afghanistan and taking them over until U.S. air strikes drive them out (RFE/RL).
The U.S. military operation, known as Operation Mountain Thrust, is laying the groundwork for future handovers of territory to NATO, expected this fall in Afghanistan's east. But the latest battles shed doubts on the defense alliance's ability to control the region after the Americans leave. CFR Senior Fellow Max Boot, writing in the Los Angeles Times, says one of NATO's biggest challenges is "getting members to volunteer troops, and to do so without placing too many caveats on their deployment." Yet Lt. Gen. David Barno, the former commander of U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan, tells CFR.org the United States will make sure its NATO allies are able to handle the task. "The United States will not do the handoff to the NATO forces unless they are fully capable of taking on the same area with the same mission capabilities," he says.
Martin Sieff of UPI writes that the conflict in southern Afghanistan—where NATO soldiers are fighting while lacking "the numbers, the air power, and the logistical support to even defend themselves adequately"—could break the longstanding alliance. Reuters agrees that the Afghanistan conflict, which is effectively the first ground war of NATO's history, will be a huge test for the alliance. This new Backgrounder examines NATO's steadily expanding mission and membership. Francesco Vendrell, the EU envoy to Afghanistan, says NATO troops will have until the fall to prove to a skeptical Afghan public it can bring security to the battle-worn south. In addition to the south, NATO forces are deployed in most of Afghanistan's provinces, in many cases serving as the military arm of provincial reconstruction teams.
The escalating violence is putting increasing political pressure on Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has lashed out at neighboring Pakistan for aiding Taliban fighters (BBC). President Pervez Musharraf and other Pakistani officials have denied the charges, citing the presence of some 90,000 Pakistani soldiers along the Afghan border as evidence of their country's commitment to reining in terror attacks (AP). Ahmed Rashid writes for YaleGlobal Online that the Taliban's resurgence is threatening stability in the region as well as the U.S.-Pakistan alliance. A CFR special report calls on coalition powers to press the Pakistani government to arrest Taliban leaders there and to move aggressively to shut down networks aiding suicide bombers.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.