Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > About Those Nukes, Iran …
| Prepared by: | Lionel Beehner |
|---|
France's UN Ambassador, Jean-Marc de La Sabliere, at Security Council (AP/Osamu Honda).
Iran has until the end of August to halt its enrichment of uranium and all other "research and development" activities or face the threat of sanctions. So declares the UN Security Council in its latest resolution, which passed fourteen to one (Qatar opposed). Should Tehran choose not to comply, under Article 41 of Chapter Seven of the UN Charter, the Security Council can consider multilateral sanctions. Iran indicated it would not respond before August 22 (Bloomberg).
The resolution is legally binding under international law and is the most strongly worded ultimatum to date. An earlier version of the ultimatum called for immediate sanctions but pressure from China and Russia led to more ambiguous language. Both have shied away from imposing punitive measures against Iran, a major energy supplier. Iran has yet to signal whether it will accept a package of energy, commercial, and technological incentives proposed in June by the permanent five members of the Security Council and Germany but maintains it has the right, granted under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, to peaceful nuclear technology.
The latest round of demands on Iran comes amid an escalating crisis in the Middle East between Hezbollah and Israel. A number of analysts suggest that Iran arranged for Hezbollah to attack Israel, or at least encouraged the incursion, to distract attention from its nuclear activities and assert itself as a regional hegemon. "In Tehran, a dogmatic leadership imbued with messianic aims is both behind Hezbollah's forays and capitalizing on them to establish itself as the vanguard of political Islam," writes CFR Senior Fellow Ray Takeyh in the International Herald Tribune. Hezbollah's incursion into Israel also sends "the signal that any international pressure on [Iran's] nuclear program would meet with strong resistance, says CFR President Richard Haass.
A number of experts are calling for direct negotiations with Iran (with no preconditions attached) to address not only the nuclear issue but also its relationship to terrorist groups like Hezbollah and its interference in Iraq. Haass calls a strong Iran "a fact of life," and says diplomacy should not be seen as a favor to Tehran but as a way to advance U.S. interests in the region.
The Bush administration has not ruled out direct diplomacy per se, reversing decades of official American foreign policy, but has demanded that Iran first suspend its nuclear activities. The White House has also ramped up its public-diplomacy spending seven-fold—outlined in this Backgrounder—to counter anti-Americanism in Iran and reach out more to its opposition groups. Yet some Iranian dissidents, including investigative journalist Akbar Ganji, say U.S. funds could be better spent on Iranian studies programs at American universities rather than on foreign aid or soft-diplomacy initiatives.
The emergence of Iran as a regional powerbroker has broad implications for the Middle East (CSMonitor). Some experts and Arab leaders warn of a so-called "Shiite crescent"—explained in this Backgrounder—that will further tip the balance of power in Tehran's favor. Others say U.S. foreign policy unintentionally abetted its rise by removing regimes formerly hostile to Iran —the Taliban's and Saddam Hussein's. Now, as CFR Senior Adjunct Fellow Vali Nasr recently told Charlie Rose, Tehran "wants essentially to consolidate these gains" (Video clip).
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
