Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Battle Set on U.S. Offshore Drilling
| Prepared by: |
|---|
The Discoverer Deep Seas drills for oil in the Gulf of Mexico. (AP/Alex Brandon)
In the six months since President Bush warned of the country's "addiction" to foreign oil, prices have increased a further $10 per barrel, and the Middle East faces the prospect of regional war. So it might come as no surprise to see the Senate joining the House in passing legislation vastly expanding the areas open to offshore drilling in a quest for what proponents describe as "energy security" (Orlando Sentinel). But the Senate bill, passed late Tuesday (AP), differs substantially from a House of Representatives measure passed in June, raising doubts about the prospects for new energy legislation this year.
The House measure would lift 25-year-old bans on leases for drilling over 100 miles from the U.S. coast, permit leasing between 50 miles and 100 miles unless a state blocks it, and permanently ban exploration within 50 miles of the coast, pending state approval. The Senate would keep much of the moratorium on drilling in place but lift it in 8.3 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico. The legislative debate, touching on coastal tourism, environmental protection, and energy security, has created some strange bedfellows in both houses of Congress, as the Washington Post points out. The more ambitious House measure enjoys most support among majority Republicans, who cite the prospect of weaning the country off foreign fuel dependence by the vast quantities believed present in off-limits areas of U.S. territorial waters. The Interior Department's Minerals Management Service says the Outer Continental Shelf, for example, holds about 420 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas, which industry officials say could heat every home in the United States for decades. But environmentalists cast doubt on the impact of such drilling, adding that, among other things, it maintains the country's addiction to fossil fuels (CNNMoney.com).
Both bills involve large royalty statements to affected states but some analysts view the Senate version as having a better chance of making it into law. The chairman of the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM), says it's only a first step, adding "I will in due course argue for opening more (Sarasota Herald Tribune), and then more, and then more, and then more."
From other quarters comes a rising call for more energy efficiency. The Center for American Progress, composed of many former Clinton administration officials, has proposed a new plan calling for at least one-quarter of the liquid fuels consumed by the United States to come from renewable energy sources by 2025 (PDF). This follows Bush administration moves to invest more in renewable fuels amid signs that so-called "cellulosic ethanol" has the potential to displace up to 30 percent of the country's current fuel use. This Backgrounder examines the country's main energy sources today.
Independent of federal moves, at least twenty-two U.S. states now support separate initiatives for renewable energy, says the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Alternate and renewable fuel sources can also ease climate change concerns. This CFR policy initiative, written by Adjunct Senior Fellow David Victor, offers several options the government could pursue, including the creation of a global system of emissions trading that would build markets for low-emission technologies. Princeton University energy experts Stephen Pacala and Robert Socolow propose a stabilization wedge model of seven equal "wedge" activities—either technologies or lifestyle changes—to reduce carbon emissions.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Browse Content By Region IssuePublication TypeThe Think TankFor The MediaFor Educators About CFR
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
