home > by publication type > daily analysis > Bloodshed Halts, Enmity Thrives
Email
| Prepared by: | Michael Moran |
|---|
A displaced Lebanese man returns home after the cease-fire. (AP/Lefteris Pitarakis)
A United Nations Security Council truce finally forced Israel and Hezbollah to cease fire (BBC), but a final weekend of rockets, artillery, ground combat, and air strikes left few believing the larger Arab-Israeli conflict is anything but worse. The text of the resolution (Ynet) calls on Israeli forces to withdraw "in parallel" with the deployment of 15,000 Lebanese forces, which will be bolstered by an international force of the same strength operating under liberal rules of engagement.
The resolution came after thirty-three days of fighting which left well over 1,000 civilians dead in Lebanon, and another 155 civilian victims in Israel, according to initial accounting. Hezbollah took severe casualties, too, with Israel claiming to have killed at least 500 of the terrorist group's guerrillas. Raghida Dergham, diplomatic corresponent of Dar Al-Hayat, notes the group now stands at a crossroads—whether to cede the Lebanese state its sovereignty and continue its evolution into a political party, or to conclude "this war is a battle for the survival of the party and the movement, even if the result is the complete destruction of Lebanon and its people." Michael Young, opinion editor of the Daily Star of Lebanon, suggests Hezbollah will never lay down its weapons (NYT). Still, the group was able to lay claim to a victory of sorts merely by surviving (AP). This dynamic became evident soon after the fighting began and may have led the United States to shift its emphasis (NYT) from military support for Israel toward a negotiated solution as the war wore on. The ceasefire has to be viewed as fragile, notes CFR senior fellow Lee Feinstein, particularly since neither Syria nor Iran were involved in the process of concluding it.
Further afield, though, the reputation of the United States, which supported Israel's war aim of "degrading" Hezbollah but also was accused of deliberately delaying UN diplomacy as a result, may be at an all-time low in the region. In the new issue of the New Yorker, Seymour Hersh alleges Washington involved itself in intimate aspects of the war in south Lebanon, providing broad support politically and satellite and other intelligence for targeting purposes. However, among those quoted is Richard Armitage, deputy secretary of state until 2004, who contents this U.S.-Israeli strategy backfired: "The only thing that the bombing has achieved so far is to unite the population against the Israelis." Qatar's foreign minister, Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr al-Thani, tells Newsweek in an interview the war did inestimable damage to America's already battered regional reputation. Dennis Ross, former U.S. Middle East envoy, says Washington's ability to restrain Israel may have been overestimated. Since Israel felt it alone could disarm Hezbollah, he argues, Olmert may have felt compelled to try. Nonetheless, says Peter Bouckaert, in Lebanon for Human Rights Watch, both sides have committed "war crimes." CFR President Richard Haass echoes many others in arguing no long-term solution is possible if the United States continues to refuse to talk with Hezbollah's backers, Syria and Iran. Syria's U.S. ambassador says his country is ready to play a constructive role if engaged by Washington.
Hezbollah, meanwhile, emerges militarily mauled but with its reputation bolstered in several ways—as a powerful force in terms of guerrilla tactics (WashPost) and as champion of those in the world who believe violence is the only way to deal with Israel (al-Jazeera). Khaled Abu Toameh, a Palestinian contributor to the Jerusalem Post, notes over fifty newborns were named Nasrallah in the West Bank over the past three weeks. As analyst Yaakov Katz puts it in the same paper, "while the fighting in Lebanon might be coming to an end, the infighting in Israel is just beginning" over the war's outcome and conduct. A Haaretz analyst noted that, even on the thirty-third and final day of the fighting, 250 Hezbollah rockets struck Israel.
For deeper reading, the Congressional Research Service offers this backgrounder on the conflict. CFR.org provides Backgrounders on the history of international intervention forces in the Mideast, as well as the many failed efforts to legislate a solution to the conflict at the United Nations. MSNBC.com's side-by-side satellite photos demonstrate the damage sustained in one Beirut neighborhood. The BBC rounds up the positions and interests of the different parties with a stake in the conflict.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.