home > by publication type > daily analysis > Colombia's 'Drugs and Thugs'
Email
| Prepared by: |
|---|
Anti-narcotics officers with a cocaine-filled statue uncovered in Bogota. (AP/William Fernando Martinez)
Colombian police officers recently flew to Kabul to advise Afghan authorities—plagued by a skyrocketing opium trade—on successful counter-narcotics tactics (Washington Times). Such a trip begs the question, what successful tactics? Though the overall level of coca cultivation is down nearly 50 percent from its peak in 2000, Colombia remains the largest producer of cocaine in the world. Despite billions of dollars of U.S. aid under Plan Colombia, in 2005 Colombia provided more than two-thirds of the world's supply, and the amount of land used for coca cultivation increased, according to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime Colombia Coca Cultivation Survey (PDF). Adam Isaacson of the Center for International Policy highlights the survey's most significant findings in this blog post.
On the other hand, President Alvaro Uribe's overwhelming reelection victory in May—he won 62 percent of the vote—suggests Colombia's voters, at least, see this as progress (Forbes). While the metrics of the war on drugs show mixed results, the war on the thugs who traffic them has made some headway. Uribe spent much of his first term fighting the country's largest rebel group, the FARC, and demobilizing some 30,000 paramilitary fighters. His "democratic security" strategy (Economist) is widely credited with sharply reducing Colombia's murders, kidnappings, and massacres. But critics say the government has not provided enough training and employment programs for the demobilized fighters. Their fears of recidivism may be well-grounded: A recent Colombian government report says ex-paramilitary members have formed at least ten new gangs—with names like the Black Eagles and the Red Eagles—to engage in drug smuggling and extortion (Reuters). Uribe says he is not afraid to negotiate a peace with the FARC, but he does fear "falling short of that goal and instead seeing our gains in security eroded" (VOA).
As he begins his second term, Uribe will continue to enjoy strong financial support from the United States. Plan Colombia—aimed at decreasing the drug trade, reducing violence, and improving the economy—was set to expire at the end of 2005, but Congress provided the same level of funding—roughly $463 million (PDF)—in 2006. An Andes 2020 report argues that Plan Colombia is too narrowly focused on counter narcotics and security, especially since many experts say interdiction efforts such as aerial spraying and uprooting crops simply produce a "push-down, pop-up effect" in which other countries move to fill the supply vacuum. This Backgrounder looks at the U.S.-led "drug war" at a time when other wars have arisen to compete for attention and resources.
The International Crisis Group suggests the European Union should step in to help Colombia design a peace strategy (PDF) that incorporates rural governance, regional development, and restructured demobilization programs. Writing from Medellin—once one of the most violent cities in the world but now with a crime rate lower than Baltimore's—Isaacson says in addition to Uribe's tough security policies, the city government deserves credit for heavy investment in its own paramilitary reintegration program. This Human Rights Watch letter is highly critical of Uribe's approach to demobilization. Specifically, it claims he consistently bows to the interests of paramilitary leaders and has not pursued constitutional remedies for the violence (see Editor's Note below). This special report from Frontline, U.S. public television's documentary maker, examines the decades-long American antinarcotics efforts.
Editor's Note: The original version of this Daily Analysis Brief mischaracterized the recommendations of Human Rights Watch's letter.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
Explore international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation with a new interactive from CFR's program on International Institutions and Global Governance.
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1.800.537.5487, fax +1.410.516.6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1.212.434.9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
In War of Necessity, War of Choice, Richard N. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of two wars between the United States and Iraq involving the two presidents Bush and Saddam Hussein, and writes an authoritative, personal account of how U.S. foreign policy is made, what it should seek, and how it should be pursued.
In Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know, Julia E. Sweig presents a remarkably accessible portrait of Cuba’s unique place on the world stage over the past fifty years, including its internal politics, its often fraught relationship with the United States, and its shifting relationship with the global community.
As Ray Takeyh shows in Guardians of the Revolution, behind the famous personalities and extremist slogans of Iran is a nation that is far more pragmatic—and complex—than many in the West have been led to believe.
Complete list of CFR Books
This report finds that nuclear weapons will remain a fundamental element of U.S. national security in the near term, and makes recommendations on how to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. deterrent nuclear force, prevent nuclear terrorism, and strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation regime.
About Independent Task Forces at CFR
Complete list of Task Force reports
The Canadian oil sands present an important challenge to policymakers: they promise energy security benefits but present climate change problems. Michael A. Levi assesses the energy security and climate change effects of the oil sands and makes recommendations for U.S. policymakers within the context of broader bilateral relations with Canada.
This report explores an important element of the maritime policy regime: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Author Scott G. Borgerson examines the international negotiations that led to the convention, the history of debates in the United States over whether to join it, and the strategic importance of the oceans for U.S. foreign policy today.
Complete list of Council Special Reports
To request permission to reprint or reuse CFR material, please fill out this permissions request form (PDF), referring to the instructions on page 1.
Copyright 2009 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.